North Stoke Life

There has never been such a thing as Slavery. We choose it. An exterior force does not have the power to nudge anyone to do things they do not want to do. That idea is a childish projection onto wealth and power. An 'escape' for the slave.  Only you, can grant, the nudger access. Else they have no power over you. None. You can walk away every time. You are the final arbiter of your choices. Some mostly choose slavery. Others more freedom. That is all.  The proportion of slaves to freemen has always been the same - 99-1%. This is the meaning of the term 'The 1%' coined during the Occupy protests. The term was captured and fully misunderstood, as usual, by the cultural Marxists running the protests. Lo and behold they are running nations today. They like slavery. Freemen are to be exiled. Most people are slaves. A few are freemen. This is a choice, in totality, for everyone born.  If you object to this observation, then please show me the exact mechanics, which changes pe...

This isn't an ancient thing. It prevails today more intensely than it has ever done.  This is not an opinion. It is observed. I can see it happening all the time right in front of my face. It's one of the only important things I know, that I know. This observation is simple for me to test: that is, can I question my master without fear of retribution? If I cannot, clearly I have a master and I am his slave. And I know I'm forbidden from questioning my master. It is another thing that I know, that I know. I know I will never properly do it. This is not the only test. But it is a simple one I can induce immediately and be certain of. And the cause and effect might well be driven by collective psychic forces - by 'the mob' or a perceived one. Whether it be a god, the state or an ideology, it's all the same. I want a master to rule me and to protect me. More than anything else I want this. More than I do to receive love, and to give it.  This is observed with great ...

Add your own evidence signalling we're all slaves in the comments and I'll gratefully put them on the list below. Go up to a slave in ancient Rome and ask them if they believe they are a slave. They would not be in the least bit offended and would immediately say yes, why do you ask? And probably invite you for a drink. If that was me today I would be offended if asked and likely would think anyone asking was a bit of a nut. Today, I've forgotten that I'm a slave. Not on purpose. It is not even how I have been raised by the system though it looks badly like it is. Nor is it wealth and power whom enslave me.  It is me, who does it. I am angry with me about it. And I project my anger onto anyone who asks. I choose it. But It's not 'on the earth' where I make my choice. And it is on the earth were I will face the consequences of my choice. It's so tempting to try and escape - "Of course I'm not a slave especially today. I have democracy you fool!...

By implication this also means everyone is a slave and always has been a slave. There is no period where people have not been slaves.  I'm not trying to paint a dim view here. I am pointing at it directly because few important things could be more true. And nearly all people deny it furiously so it's a perfect theme for proper scrutiny.  Where is my master. Who is it?  There are only two places my master can live: out there somewhere - and the thing which controls me in here - and the thing I control If my master is 'out there' then my slavery is in the hands of whatever is, 'out there'. And I will complain my whole life about the problems I myself create in the world. Often causing a great deal of harm in the process. Having rendered my master and its actions into the unconscious. If my master is 'in here', then I am in control of it. I am creating it. It belongs to me. Master and slave cooperate in harmony. My first duty in life is to bring this observ...

If you blame wealth and power, you're no longer in control and are under stress like a slave. You will tend to project onto those to whom it most easily sticks if you rely on others to make important decisions for you. Why will you project like this? Because it helps you temporarily to 'escape' from the problems you created for yourself. The best politicians are super at convincing you of this approach in life.  For example, if someone asks you what stocks or assets to invest in, they will never be in control of their decision because somebody else will have decided for them. This will be a difficult to control stress factor for them because it was not them who decided but an authority figure or expert or just somebody else. If they decide in their own right, even if they lose in the end they won't have suffered that stressful slave-like condition where they're not in control. They will be well in the mind still. If they believe what someone else told them to believ...

Following is a psychoanalytical audit I recently performed on someone captured by a crypto cult. His Christianity cult also comes out strongly in his approach. His life is full of self induced suffering. Here is how I would suggest anyone captured by a Master demon like this, rescues themselves. In this specific case it looks at just one of the cults possessing him - crypto. --- This is how to understand why BitcoinSV has failed. It's not a technical question, but a psychic one. Here is how to test if you are also a victim of your own choices: Simply: take the question you object to being asked the most. And analyse it from cradle to grave. Using logic, reason and the scientific method. Try to resist any cosy beliefs informing your thought else you will fail.  Tell me the conclusion. Write it down. The big challenge is that you will only succeed if you are capable of suspending your beliefs for the duration. Otherwise you will just be looking at your beliefs and not the objected qu...

Most people - the democratic majority, are obedient instruments of authority. They may be many others things too. Their obedience is by far the biggest. Both rich and poor. It makes no difference, everyone follows this model. It is why even the intellectuals, leadership and bureaucrats cannot ever see anything important coming. They too are simply spending most of their time signalling obedience to authority. Even Tommy Robinson, Mr. Anti-establishment is doing it. Everyone is doing it - signalling their obedience to authority as a primary function in everyday life. But why? Because it works!  Everyone is signalling obedience far more than their abstract principles - these hallowed principles are really being used as theatre to mask the shame of being an obedient slave.  Political debate talks a lot about white guilt lately. But it has nothing to do with the history of race slavery. It can't do if all these slaves signalling obedience right now, are extant! The gui...

The 21st Century Form of Master & Slave Relationship The Homeowner Class - the 21st century slave owner The immigrant - the 21st century slave Immigrants being the new form of slave. The modern day exodus. The latest highland clearance and lowland enclosure. Is it not true that the Israelites in exile from Egypt where simply moving to the dubiously named free land for redemption, only to discover that someone already owned it and they had to pay rent. Ultimately delivering their plight? "Had chattel slavery continued, some similar device for the ownership and management of slaves would in time have been adopted. But by changing the form of slavery-by freeing men and appropriating land-all the advantages of chattel slavery can be secured without any of the disadvantages which in a complex society attend the owning of a particular man by a particular master." "We have not really abolished slavery; we have  retained it in its most insidious and wide-spread form-in  a f...

All of them should be abolished. Immediately. Law cannot treat human rights. Because law is rules made up by a collective of people. What is 'just' is not something an unconscious collective can deal with. It is unconscious! Only the autonomous individual is awake. Behind every social problem, lies a social wrong.  An individual is not a part of society but themself. Society forms when the individual has given up their duties and obligations in the world, in exchange for unjust collective rights and the law. And I quote: " Robinson Crusoe, as we all know, took Friday as his slave. Suppose, however, that instead of taking Friday as his slave, Robinson Crusoe had welcomed him as a man and a brother; had read him a Declaration of Independence, an Emancipation Proclamation and a Fifteenth Amendment, and informed him that he was a free and independent citizen, entitled to vote and hold office; but had at the same time also informed him that that particular island was his (Robin...

And slavery is not about wealth. Its about a much higher thing. And has never had very much to do with race.  We want the protection of a Master more than we want wealth. But we want wealth too, just not as much as we want a Master. And it's this Master who enslaves us. Though we don't really want the Master to rob us, we will live with his robbery so long as the Master protects us. Slavery is extant. More so now than historically. Or at least in equal proportion to what its always been. But we find this hard to think about because we think slavery is about stealing and selling our bodies.  Or the getting of our hard work, without the giving of it in a fair exchange. Taxation is right on the border of what we wrongly think is slavery. But slavery is more fundamentally about stealing our minds, beliefs, thoughts. Or, is it not really about stealing these things and more that we willingly submit these things in exchange for the protection of a Master? We prefer a Master to copio...

Many talk confidently about slavery and reparations and so on and so on. How few have really dug into the root of it, with the authenticity of Jesus?  The miss the church keeps on making -  The Condition of Labor: An Open Letter to Pope Leo XIII  There is slavery, and there is slavery - Slavery and Slavery What is so remarkable, and such a strong 'signal', is that so called former slaves reject all of it when asking for reparations. Let alone the alleged beneficiaries who are being asked to pay it who are still too afraid for some reason to point it all out with clarity and confidence.  It's such a strong signal. Indicating that by implication, all people, everywhere have always preferred to be slaves, than to be free. And that the political battle over slavery proper is really all about who can be owned by the best master. The signal is very strong.  Notice that socialism for example, only criticises their competitors 'master', never its own. And likewsie for e...

I Own Slaves. How so? Because I own a lot of land, and collect rent from tenants. By implication, this makes me a master and other people slaves. How so? Because rent is an unearned income - it has no cost inputs related to the rental output. If I did nothing for the income, who did? Whomever did the work are the slaves. That might not be my tenants but in the myriad of economic exchanges across the world, tenants are the largest class of slaves. This economic effect applies to mortgagors identically, except that the mortgagor at least has a hope of becoming a freemen one day. This is a most curious proposition because most people think the old negro race suffered most from slavery. The negro race even seem to be proud of their monopoly on slavery which is even more curious. Once you see through this, and understand the distribution of wealth is governed totally by who can claim the economic rents, it's obvious the negro race are a teeny weeny proportion of all slaves ever to have ...

from a chapter in Social Problems In the unbounded reaches of colonised outer space, Mr. X, as we all know, took Mamdami as his slave.  Suppose, however, that instead of taking Mamdami as his slave, Mr. X had welcomed him as a man and a brother; had read him a Declaration of Independence, an Emancipation Proclamation and a Fifteenth Amendment, and informed him that he was a free and independent citizen, entitled to vote and hold office; but had at the same time also informed him that that particular space island was his (Mr. X's) private and exclusive property.  What would have been the difference?  Since without superluminal travel capability Mamdami could not fly up into space nor traverse to the next space island, since if he lived at all he must live on the space island, he would have been in one case as much a slave as in the other. Mr. X's ownership of the space island would be equivalent to his ownership of Mamdami.

This will be an astonishing thing to hear for most people. But only because we have not heard it before. Up until a century ago, most people new it by intuition. Today the idea has conveniently been driven from our minds via disinformation in schools and universities, from all media channels and successive governments of all party's the people freely chose to elect. So is it any wonder? "Robinson Crusoe, as we all know, took Friday as his slave. Suppose, however, that instead of taking Friday as his slave, Robinson Crusoe had welcomed him as a man and a brother; had read him a Declaration of Independence, an Emancipation Proclamation and a Fifteenth Amendment, and informed him that he was a free and independent citizen, entitled to vote and hold office; but had at the same time also informed him that that particular island was his (Robinson Crusoe's) private and exclusive property. What would have been the difference? Since Friday could not fly up into the air nor swim off...

This idea proposes that the state, is a gang, in all the essential ways. And the only escape from this subjugating state is to become a freeman, else you will remain a slave to the state. To escape the state gang and become a freeman one has to run to the freeland.  It's a co-dependent relationship. Between the husband as the master in the form of the state gang. And the wife as the slaves in the great masse of people. It's a co-dependent relationship. There are those who say wealth and power are to blame for the world's evils. And others who say the people who elect them are most complicit. But it's a co-dependent relationship. Both are relying on the other to maintain an unjust and destructive relationship. The couple are struggling to marry, consumate it and raise children wise enough to understand how to run to the freeland. There are many types of state gangs which form naturally within social organisation. The primary winning state, corporate entities, etc. And th...

a crowd of scammers stealing No need for a conspiracy if we're all at it, conspiring against each other! Right? Talking to a friend today after realising a private company had failed to do its contracted duty yet has not offered a refund nor looks likely to.  This looks like yet another exposition of how the system is rigged for scammers, among millions of others happening daily.  By scammers I do not mean a few thieves who need to be jailed. I mean thievery is systemic - everyone is at it.  We are not bad people, per se. But we pay high taxes and taxes must be paid before quality of service, else we go to jail. We're far less likely to go to jail for stealing from friends and family, so long as we pay our taxes and especially if we're not white. And taxes today are to keep benefit scroungers afloat. Most of the theft - which is not taxation, starts at home. Taxation is a primary obedience structure , some might call it an instrument of wilful slavery. Slaves are scamm...

Its hard to understand how the tariff - a tax on the work and business of the home nation, can be successfully used to Make America Great Again... until you consider the following:  However you feel about America right now, there are 2 things you cannot escape: She has 'protected' the rest of the world since the second world war at great cost, largely from the attacks of Power - whomever that might be, against the people. Both internal and external attacks She owns the second greatest monopoly of all - the ability to create money out of nothing and spend it on foreign goods, at will Now, if you look carefully at both these observations, they kind of cancel each other out don't they:  "You let us create the money like a king. And we promise to protect, cloth, feed and house you" Leaving behind a kind of master/slave relationship. America being the 'Master'. The people of the RoW being the 'Slave'. What's curious about this subsequent observation...

Have you considered what this means before jumping to a conclusion well programmed by society? Does it mean I'm anti government or anarchist? Does it mean I'm anti state or anti King? What I mean is that SOCIETY IS INHERENTLY UNJUST, as a way to organise humans. Lets take a quick look at is primary institutions: Taxation, as a way to fund itself, confiscates it's constituents hard won earnings. Could there be a worse source of funding than stealing by force with this systemic theft. It makes the incentives to commit crime, legion. It causes war. And is root cause of poverty, the wealth divide and bankruptcy. How about the law, where the one who tells the best story is innocent, and the other guilty. Notwithstanding the facts. And once society has monopolised the law, what is left for justice? And health. Well we saw in 2020 how systemically corrupt that is and need say no more, except that most healers stay out of or are prohibited from entering the business, by society? Wh...

Presently our dear leaders are negotiating with Barbados on £40 trillion in slavery reparations. About 20 years of total UK productivity. What will be the effects of this policy root cause? Do I need to remind people about what happened in Germany following the appalling reparations they had to pay for the first world war? Do I really need to remind anyone? And there is more, much more. If reparations were ever to happen in Barbados, it would all end up in real estate prices. Just wanted you to know. Share with friends there so they can exploit it. So how many negro slave descendants own the real estate there. I can run the numbers if you like? Grok tells me , conservatively, the number is about 30% at best. It may be fewer.  If a large part of all the property there is owned by non negro, non descendants(likely), how will that benefit the descendants of the former slaves, even if it were possible to identify them accurately, which it certainly is not? So at best only 30% of the 7...

  This is why the main 4 uniparty's in the UK have abandoned it. This is why the US President is insisting on its wholesale adoption. It becomes nigh on impossible to steal an election if your identity is linked with your vote using a digital signature. Because using this everyday tech your signature is immutable. (cannot be reversed nor repudiated). Not even the state can tamper with a 256 bit hash quickly enough and at scale, to undermine an election * And with further simple digital tech, and without impeding your privacy at all, your vote can be proven to have taken place. (Zero Knowledge Proofs) The slave states of the world are not smart. They are slow. And why would a slave try hard at anything if no extra salary will be gained by it? Despite all this degeneracy these states have have finally recognised the truth in this allegation and the 'benefits' of control through obedience which come by abandoning Digital ID or Voter ID.  From primary evidence in the past 3 US ...