Skip to main content

Cryptocurrency Holders, Recognise at Some Point, They're Holding the Proceeds of Crime

During my research into Bitcoin over the past year I've been astonished how so many bitcoin holders go bananas when I point out that it won't be long before the narrative of censorship resistance will be a thing of the past. The responses take the form of typical social engineering censorship and attacks ad hominem. Even among some professionals here on Linkedin. Even, among our senior politicians.

Why would people embarrass themselves so publicly?

This piece may be helpful as a read prior to considering this further.

<a href="https://unboundedcapital.com/blog/could-coordinated-law-enforcement-actions-send-btc-to-zero">COULD COORDINATED LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS SEND BTC TO ZERO?</a>

The conclusion based on repeat evidence is those who censor you the most are more likely to be passively laundering stolen goods or the proceeds of crime through their bitcoin assets. Maybe only a small amount, and almost certainly without taking part in the crime itself. Nevertheless, the law will see it as equivalent.

Not only does this apply to individuals but institutions in finance, media, and more widely the well known professional services corporations. There is nowhere that is not balls deep in crypto, a large part of which is the proceeds of crime.

So when I point out with technical clarity that bitcoin is neither encrypted nor anonymous thus cannot possibly be censorship resistant, it means every bit of activity handling the proceeds of crime is stored immutably on chain in clear text for the authorities to pick up as they so please.

Obviously this inner revelation of long held complicity raises a huge shadow projection from the unconscious guilty resulting in bitter and spiteful social engineering attacks.

Soon the law and tax collector might be knocking on their door, with immutable evidence carefully prepared for the judge, sitting in clear text on chain, making a guilty plea the best option. One cannot escape the law and bitcoin makes no difference whatsoever either technically, politically or legally.

The astonishing thing to consider here is all the big crypto names already realise this yet are doing their best to drag it out for as long as possible, I believe, in the hope the politicians involved can be bought. And there's a slow trickle of CxO exits going on daily now.

As always, the outcome rests on the integrity of leadership the great mass freely selects.

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...