North Stoke Life

Meaning the people have to consent, participate, habituate or resign themselves to it first for authority to have any chance of controlling them for sustained periods of time. But the common belief is that control happens from the top down. That is, the people are forced to obey by some mysterious force of a cabal of wealth and power. This is not just a belief in conspiracy theorists. The majority of people believe it. Perhaps this is a false dichotomy. And the people themselves *are* authority, one and the same, co trolling themselves. And leaders are merely a proxy for it, puppets. WIP

Non institutionalised morals are bringing institutionalised morals back into balance. Caring for both the good and the bad does this. Master and slave morals are both institutionalised and inherently unjust. The left is slave morals. The right is master morals. Autonomous morals are determined by each individual. So cannot be institutionally corrupt.

The Archons have no authority over me unless I first give it to them. Archons understood in myth and symbol are internal forces, which in weak moments I feel are blocking me from achieving or maintaining my autonomy. This is a fallacy and a slave morality because I am the final arbiter when it comes to autonomy.  I speak in myth and symbol because it signals truth which cannot be told in any other way. Here it's to point at the fallacy there's a fight against these forces I feel are blocking me from absolute and unconditional freedom. Rather than me, myself, I giving up my freedom for a cosy life of protection. This post therefore is to point out how I'm trying to escape from my own duties and obligations under a veil of overwhelming external attacking forces which I cannot hold back. The Archons are mythical entities we use to help us to escape from our own complicity in the world. Through our obedience to tribal authority, who provide us with protection in exchange for ou...

This is an example of learning how to remember the future. The people who are 'easy' to dislike politically are actually being exploited. At scale.

Think about a myth, as a truth, which cannot be told in any other way?  We all use them, hopefully to our benefit. Often to our loss. They are extant.  We cannot escape the observation that all of us live primarily by our myths. Yet for some reason we boldly declare in public that we are reasonable, rational and live by fact. In a kind of psychic 'escape' - we do it, unconsciously when it's a group social activity.  Myths cannot be proven. But they can signal truths, which everyone by intuition, knows is happening. Call it god if you like. It doesn't matter what you call it. What matters is that you have the capacity to confess to it happening.  A confession. A confessor. The masculine and the feminine. In a marriage. So is it necessary to prove something. Is it necessary to 'win'? So long as the myths I use help me turn the right way in the world, does it matter if anything can be proven materially?  Why the obsession with proof? Sure, proof has utility. But do...