North Stoke Life

AI, though a much faster search engine, has become fast enough for us to realise that things are not invented by individuals. We build our new devices based on the shoulders of what is previously held in common by all. When I create a new word, or arrange existing words in a new order, do I own the new order of these words? The law says yes. I'm going to show you how that law is unjust. That is, copyright, patents and trademarks are inherently unjust law in action. And the advent of AI has enabled this wisdom to emerge. Everything is built on a past idea which is already recorded in history. Use Grok to find out about something or other. Do it often enough and you will find out about something apparently new. Really find out. What you have just found out will appear incredible. Occasionally it will be the first time anyone has found out about this new thing. But all Grok is, is a search engine on steroids. Hyper useful, yes.  What you did with your research, using Grok,...

We are all playing a game which in public we refuse to admit we're playing.  We all know the rules and fully accept them in the game.  The rules are to scam your neighbours to get on in the world. And we all carry it out willingly by any means and at scale, i.e. nationwide activity by all, all people are partaking in it, politically there is no difference between the winners and losers and how they play the game In the end, some households win and some lose.  For the winners the true reason for their win was that they were better players in the scam - effectively they took the rules and used them to deliver 'success'. For the losers that they were worse players.  The winners totally accept all of this. The losers are totally unable to accept any of this. Everyone took part willingly, knew the rules and were totally aware of the consequences of winning and losing, a priori. For an outside observer such as an alien, there is no escaping this observation. The winners be...

We often talk about how poor the quality of leadership is these days. We put it down to the possibility that the best leaders keep well away from the job for good reason - because the people they will have to work with are so bad.  I disagree with this analysis, not least because it's circular reasoning - "we get bad people because bad people are here". This kind of view is also bad because it insists that wealth and power are to blame as a way to help me to escape from my own individual complicity - very poor expert help. Still, it goes much deeper than even this though. The quality of leadership in the world sitting in the highest seats has descended to new depths because "I" deliberately refuse to elect and select the best to lead. The electorate and what have you, refuse to elect the good people, deliberately, and this is why we're now seeing such poor quality leadership on the 'front benches'. It has nothing to do with evil people st...

It's not possible to have a world without money, while exchanges are being made.  Because in all times and places through history, the most exchanged thing, automatically becomes the money.  And once that new form of money, becomes the money, it gets used as money more than it used to get used up as wealth. The common fallacy is that money is the same thing as wealth. But money is not wealth. It is money. Meditate on this point for a few days and all sorts of astonishing stuff will spring into the light for you.  There is nothing you can do about this. Nature controls it in totality.  All you can do is work with it. And rise above the inevitable corruption which is a human trait and nothing to do with the money.  Money is not conscious of itself. It just is. And emerges naturally when social organisation starts to make exchanges. Even barter is very limited in scale and timeframe at the begining.

Imagine this:  People actually believe they can own the earth, the stuff on it and often the other people there too. In perpetuity. Can you imagine anything more preposterous? Could there be a more insecure and fearful mind than this. I'm not saying ownership should be banned or promoted even more, for the greater good or something. I am observing the slave mind happening.