Say a nations Treasury wanted to adopt a CBDC using BitcoinSV as its public blockchain. They have several geolocated datacentres for mining and would only mine their own transactions. Fees would all be ring-fenced and rolled back into the datacentre operations and costs as hash rate increased. (yes I know this would be a historic first) Is there any reason this would be a problem for the Treasury assuming: they had enough transactions per block happening to make it pay for the self only mining they were encrypting the transactions for their own reasons For scaling could they create their own Teranode subtrees with only CBDC tx's and broadcast them without problems? Could other miners refuse to accept them and if so would that even matter to me? All I care about is other miners build on blocks with the CBDC tx's in them? Else that would induce a hard fork. In that case would it be better for the Treasury not to take part in the mining and leave it to the private sector ...
North Stoke Life
Sightings from a hamlet in Oxfordshire, England. Everything done here is an experiment in the movement of thought and trying to observe that happening. Nothing here is a judgement call. I'm asking you simply to look at what is happening and to confess to it.