North Stoke Life

Why not use commentary from the field as a good exposition of how to respond? As follows: "If one has ever seen some of the, man on the street videos, where young people are asked simple questions about our government and history and the answers they give. Oh boy, I would say their dumb down program is working perfectly !!!" Thank you for your comment. I would say younger people have ALLOWED THEMSELVES to be conditioned in this way just like their parents have allowed it before them. And just like their children will do one day too. It's not a fair analysis to say the state or a cabal of wealth and power have conditioned them. Or manipulated them. Or coerced them.  For every choice anyone of us makes, "I am" the final arbiter in that choice. Yes, when I am uninformed, I have a tendency to submit to authority - by making an appeal to it, and accepting their wisdom prima facie, rather than doing the right thing which is to FIND OUT. And if I cannot find out within...

I'm going to show you how a conspiracy theory is used in the form of a myth, to tell extant literal truths, which cannot be told in any other way. With some examples. Where the conspiracy theorist cannot talk about it in any other way, except by myth. Because that would be self indicting. Because they know deep down where no one can see it, that they are fully yet indirectly complicit in a much bigger problem.  So they are forbidden from saying it literally. And need an escape route. Which still deflects from own complicity. Nonetheless they need a way of saying it due to the shame and guilt of it. Being still human, they need a 'confessor'. So use a derivative remote and lesser form of the bigger problem they're trying to escape from. Often not even remotely connected literally with the actual injustice. It is enough that the myth signals it unconsciously. Here are some examples. Except for the first, I'm not saying I'm right. I am saying do your ow...

I'm going to briefly tell you about an entity called 'The Collective'. Think about the tribe, of which there are several competing ones, with only a single dominant one, as having a life of its own. Acting much like an autonomous single individual - 'it thinks in myth and symbol' but is not conscious of the literal actions which result from this 'thought'.  This theory is also known as 'the collective' another primary theory I'm investigating.  I'm not saying the collective is a good or a bad thing.  I am saying it is extant and no one is aware of it...unless one can break the spell. N.B. This text is an update to the current research on the Orwell Test

I want to show you how conspiracy theories are a special form of myth. These myths are not lies, they are metaphors. Meaning they can tell people about a truth where it cannot be told in any other way.  Only via the myth. Where there is no language and nothing literal yet which can get the truth across in a traditional way. This is not to say these theories are literally true and should be believed factually - though of course the myth is a fact in itself notwithstanding anything literal in the subject matter(you cannot reasonably deny the myth itself does not exist if you're already talking about it - it is extant!  Be careful though: it is not to say they can be relied on by science. It is not to say that believing them will do you any good or any bad. It is not even to say they are good forms of myths compared to all the others. It is to say that if the world treats them like lies and mocks them, that would be a terrible system wide mistake ultimately almost cer...

In response to Restore Britain announcement today where they're very proud that they will be standing a candidate in the Makerfield by-election.  Great. So what is the strategy? To Restore Britain Re: Restore Britain will be standing a candidate in the Makerfield by-election "You cannot win an election if you only appeal to one of the tribes within the electorate. You need to make your appeal 'cross-tribal'. So forget about racism and open borders. You cannot buy enough votes/seats with such weak propaganda to form a government.  I hope you aim to win. To do that you need better propaganda. Give the electorate something they can sell their vote for. That is the only way you will win. The Greens are especially good at this. They might win the next election unless they have a decent competitor who can do that job better. I don't like this situation but it is what it is. Do you want to win or do you want to lose? If you don't win, you can't do anyt...