North Stoke Life

In response to Mr. Lowe MP discussing his immigration policy. My response is that it is a good one but will be moot if he leaves taxation without wholesale attention.  <Snip> It is great. But you must deliver a bold and wholesale policy for taxation. Else the downstream immigration policy will be moot. Start by raising the income tax and NI threshold to the median wage. About £30. That way both the welfare trap and minimum wage neglects also become moot. And millions able yet not willing to work at the current rates due to high taxation, will flow immediately into jobs. Creating millions of new Restore voters. Further along, the incentive to migrate into Britain will largely be mitigated too. With such a huge reduction in welfare, much if it can be abolished. And the remains able to work and still not willing will be that much more visible to citizens as unjust players making it easy to induct them by right.

Dear father, I was listening to your podcast today on the plight of people convicted of brutal crimes. And it made me wonder about how you might understand the meaning of 'the grace of God'? I was alarmed that you are confidently committed to asking for the death penalty in the cases you support it for.  May I ask, if you were in the same position as those you want killed, would you have not done the same thing? I hear you. You might now be thinking "I would never commit such a crime don't be ridiculous". I would respond ironically by suggesting we have a veritable Jesus Christ before us, if so. My point is, how do you know that you would not commit the same crime in their position? You have been saved by the grace of God. Can you then know what you would have done, if you have already been saved by His grace? If my interpretation of grace is 'if I do not sin, God will save me', then I will think this way.  But if my interpretation of gr...

Where it matters. I spoke to Dermot Turing, nephew of the famous Alan Turing at a cypher networking event about this the other day. He was simultaneously horrified and confused though not disbelieving when I brought it up. He has no involvement in it I'm sure but obviously even being seen to hear these things is not good for his profile, obedience wise. The topic was on my cryptography quasi conspiracy theory, where no cipher is secure if it's allowed to be used in public. Because the nation state will always demand a back door from the developers on pain of blocking exports of the tech otherwise. The state must have control over all communications as a first principle, they will say because of national security, rightly or wrongly they will do it. This is my theory. I'm not saying this is a good thing or bad thing. It is simply observed. And arguably is sensible if one's philosophy leans toward state power. Still, this is all supposition from my own intuition. Remembe...

Capitalism is where a small group of individuals gets to decide who gets to keep the goodies and how they get distributed. Socialism does exactly the same thing.  I'm showing you how both socialism and capitalism are both a fallacy, used to gain power through the vote by causing division and conflict. Call it 'diversity' if you like.  As a capitalist, a small group of individuals gets to decide who gets the goodies and distribute them. Socialism does exactly the same thing.  Thats right. There is no fundamental difference between both. There are tiny differences at the margin, such as how the freebies and power get distributed. But that is all.  Even socialism has private ownership in those who run it for cryin' out loud. Even capitalism has state control and redistribution.  Both are neurotic worldviews. If you are possessed by either, GET HELP QUICKLY! It's a wonder that something which does not really exist causes so much division and conflict. But we are hum...

notice Grok has given me all white men! I'm going to talk about how wealth and power, though often pieces of shit, are not the real problem. But the people on the whole, are. This will be extraordinarily hard for most people to accept. Because if true, no one will be able to project themselves onto wealth and power any more to blame for all the people's self induced problems.  Try the following thought experiment and see where it takes you. Imagine a nation with 200 million people. And an administration and security force of 200 thousand people. And the people of this nation are always complaining about how corrupt the administration is.  Clearly the people are always unhappy with the administration but for some reason are not yet ready to revolt. It cannot be reasonably said that the people are happy with the administration. Yet they do not act honourably for their descendants and take the administration down. So is it a stretch of your imagination to say that the people are ...