North Stoke Life

The real problem with immigration is not the migrants themselves - it is the governing authority, but more The People who select the authority, which stands in the way of migrants. The state imports migrants, en masse, for some hidden reason, commanded indirectly and legally by The People. You cannot really tell if migrants are good for the economy or not. All we can tell about migrants is that they are humans like you and I.  So at the root level - migrants or natives, makes no difference whatsoever to the productivity of an economy. It's no use pointing to an alleged inferior culture of the immigrants or their specific religion. There is no way to measure this scientifically. Besides, what we can say with much more certainty, is that cultural differences pale into insignificance if you can find the strength to look into what I'm saying below, with authenticity anyway.  The real problem with immigration is not the migrants themselves - it is the governing authority which work...

Everything is a cult. You cannot escape it  The biggest cult of all is what we call society in which pretty much everyone is a member Or, whichever is the biggest worldview commanding the greatest number of people, is The Master Cult  And we call The Master Cult, society If everything is not a cult, there must be a single giant cult in which everyone conspires against each other  The thing about a cult is that it's hard to accept that you are part of one  The bigger the cult the harder it is to tell you're a part of it  And The Master Cult is the biggest cult of all  When you join a cult you submitted most of your freedom, or all of it, in exchange for the protection the cult will give you  And now you have that protection you no longer have to concern yourself with your obligations in the world  You quickly forget your obligations and soon after that you're no longer aware that you're even a part of the cult Eventually, you will have rendered it ...

When people lose meaning in their lives generally, they will usually take up a cause, as an activist, and use that cause to restore meaning to their lives. The effect will be for the cause to become more important than almost everything else for that person. So they will tend to act with impunity on things which further that cause.  This is commonly seen among nouveau activists when they undermine a social institution, corporation or similar body of people, in order to further their meaningful cause.  This person, with an important cause, takes the law into their own hands to 'put things straight'. Naturally this sounds justified. But is it? It is only justified to the extent the cause is inherently justified. And this is by no means certain because the 'new law of this cause' is now being ruled over by the cause itself. So it is circular reasoning leading the cause. This is why in the US over the past 20 years or so we've seen a shift within most social institution...

Following is a psychoanalytical audit I recently performed on someone captured by a crypto cult. His Christianity cult also comes out strongly in his approach. His life is full of self induced suffering. Here is how I would suggest anyone captured by a Master demon like this, rescues themselves. In this specific case it looks at just one of the cults possessing him - crypto. --- This is how to understand why BitcoinSV has failed. It's not a technical question, but a psychic one. Here is how to test if you are also a victim of your own choices: Simply: take the question you object to being asked the most. And analyse it from cradle to grave. Using logic, reason and the scientific method. Try to resist any cosy beliefs informing your thought else you will fail.  Tell me the conclusion. Write it down. The big challenge is that you will only succeed if you are capable of suspending your beliefs for the duration. Otherwise you will just be looking at your beliefs and not the objected qu...

When I say society is against people, I do not mean people should oppose society. I mean people could start acting more independently of it. Be more self sufficient. Act in ways that obviate it.  I bring this up because for anyone who looks carefully at society, without prejudice, can quickly see that the bigger society becomes, the more it harms the people it has power over.  What is society? Like Maggie once said, it does not exist - "There is no such thing as society.". It is just an image that a large group of people with the greatest power over other groups, created, to administer itself. Always with a mantra of being here to help, or to save us, or to protect. And the consequence of this aspirational image is to do more harm than if the image was never created at all.  Religious people might say this is a Jesuit approach. But I am not religious and am just pointing at it for further scrutiny. Just in case all the alternatives to it, are worse. We cannot know th...

Imagine this situation: All taxation gets abolished. All of it. No exceptions. Now, all of your work, skill, industry and enterprise, no longer gets punished for doing those great things. The production of wealth. Taxation no longer harms the world by appropriating your earned incomes by force. But how would we fund government from now on though? By confiscating 100% of the UN-EARNED incomes. In other words, every other kind of income stream. Given un-earned incomes have none of your labour or capital invested in their creation, this form of revenue cannot possibly harm the results of your hard work or cripple the economic world like taxes used to. Not to mention that it cannot be evaded. You cannot move these incomes into a tax haven. They are impossible to avoid. And your annual tax return is one line. No need for an accountant and even uneducated people will be certain they're not paying too much or too little in revenue. Everything you give will directly account for...

And slavery is not about wealth. Its about a much higher thing. And has never had very much to do with race.  We want the protection of a Master more than we want wealth. But we want wealth too, just not as much as we want a Master. And it's this Master who enslaves us. Though we don't really want the Master to rob us, we will live with his robbery so long as the Master protects us. Slavery is extant. More so now than historically. Or at least in equal proportion to what its always been. But we find this hard to think about because we think slavery is about stealing and selling our bodies.  Or the getting of our hard work, without the giving of it in a fair exchange. Taxation is right on the border of what we wrongly think is slavery. But slavery is more fundamentally about stealing our minds, beliefs, thoughts. Or, is it not really about stealing these things and more that we willingly submit these things in exchange for the protection of a Master? We prefer a Master to copio...