Skip to main content

I Desire a Master. So I Must Be A Slave

This isn't an ancient thing. It prevails today more intensely than it has ever done. 

This is not an opinion. It is observed. I can see it happening all the time right in front of my face. It's one of the only important things I know, that I know.

This observation is simple for me to test: that is, can I question my master without fear of retribution? If I cannot, clearly I have a master and I am his slave. And I know I'm forbidden from questioning my master. It is another thing that I know, that I know. I know I will never properly do it.

This is not the only test. But it is a simple one I can induce immediately and be certain of. And the cause and effect might well be driven by collective psychic forces - by 'the mob' or a perceived one.

Whether it be a god, the state or an ideology, it's all the same. I want a master to rule me and to protect me. More than anything else I want this. More than I do to receive love, and to give it. 

This is observed with great ease. I'm always insisting on having a master of some kind, to rule me. Today the state has overwhelmed a god. I have killed God, right? But even those who prefer a god as the all powerful master, still choose it freely. It's different in that God is a higher form of Master

The acts of wealth and power are never forced onto me. I choose it. It is mine. It belongs to me. So when I complain about the acts of wealth and power, that is my neurosis which also belongs to me. That is the world I created at a deeper secondary level of neurosis, a pathology which I don't seem to be aware of.

It is so obvious I am too afraid to cross the frontier into the forbidden zone where there's no protection, no promises, no credit, no guarantees. And where there is freedom, where my life depends entirely on me at last. And not a master. If I cross over the border and enter this undiscovered country I have absolute and unconditional freedom. 

I want to be a slave more than anything else. It's no use me banging on about freedom, my rights and my civil liberties. When deep down my preference by far is to be a slave. That would be my neurosis.

It's a most curious thing, that some parts of the unconscious collective unit are trying to claim a monopoly over their past slavery. When they are still, like the rest of us, slaves already. Not to mention that to be so proud of ones slavery makes it that much more curious. They could at least be humble about that!

Slavery was never abolished, except nominally, as a kind of escape. An image, called freedom or emancipation, which thought created collectively and now worships. Just an image.

Thought creates an image of a world. Then thought worships the image it just created. 

This approach of using thought to create images, is a tell take signal that I am a slave. I cannot look at anything for what it actually is if it's not cosy. I have to create an image of it which feels cosy, and then worship it - to escape into cosiness, away from what's in front of my face.

And while I continue with that attitude, I will always be a slave to the extent I worship my master, whoever I deliberately choose that to be. I doesn't matter who or what.

The inevitable outcome of this in the material world is known as systemic rent seeking, where I tend to rob, my neighbours brothers and even my enemies, under the protection of the law, to get something for nothing. And the images I've created and now worship have protected rights, under the law. The law helps me to be a slave.

My master is not forced on to me. I choose it deliberately. No one is manipulating me. I allow myself to be manipulated. No one is exploiting me. I allow myself to be exploited. No one is nudging me. I allow myself to be nudged. To choose slavery and then to shout loudly about how I'm being exploited is another level, a tertiary level, of the same neurosis I created when I allowed thought to make a cosy image to help me escape into a slave fantasy.

So what is at the root of this systemic pathology? I live in permanent fear that there's not enough to go around, which is obviously absurd in the modern world today, where the productive power of all economies is so big today that no one goes short. Yes, there is still a problem with the distribution, but this is a telltale signal of the very thing I'm talking about and reinforces the point that much more intensely - the slavery that I've chosen willingly, means that I desire an unjust distribution as a right of passage into my slavery.

Nonetheless, I still believe it at a very deep level, it's almost like it's in my genes as a hold over from ancient times. Where indeed there was a dangerous challenge to my survival because there was indeed not enough to go around. But this is not the case today yet I have not evolved and climbed above that pathologically, now I have plenty.

Whether it be a god, the state or an ideology, it's all the same. I want a master to rule me and to protect me. More than anything else I want this. More than I do to receive love, and to give it. 

I desire a master. Therefore, I must be a slave more than I am anything else. 

In the end, I'm in exile, to my slavery.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...