Skip to main content

Justice & The Distribution of Wealth

The more justice there is in the distribution of a community's wealth, the more the population will tend toward a sustainable level.

What does this law of nature say to you?

It means the more unjust communities will grow in size out of control or destroy themselves.

And the more just community will become more powerful relatively (per capita) even if declining in absolute size.

What breaks this law is when just and unjust communities are deliberately mixed. The benefits of justice will be negated and all bets are off.

The more just community always wins when it decides it's time to fight for it.

It has nothing to do with government and everything to do with the will of the community and it's desire for justice.

If you've read this far without melting down, by justice in the Distribution of wealth I do not mean equality in the distribution of wealth. What I mean by justice is that those who created the wealth get to keep it and those who have created nothing do not. By right. 

A flourishing welfare state is a red flag signalling injustice in the distribution. It maintains itself by taxing gifts which otherwise would mitigate the needy.

As a citizen of a community, if your leadership is breaking this golden rule, you should remove them immediately by all means. Even if your leader is trying hard in the right direction, if they're still allowing this golden rule to be broken, they are not enough and must be replaced with whomsoever is ready to act for justice in the community.

If you do not remove them immediately so be it. You will meet your fate.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...