Skip to main content

The Orwell Test

I'm going to show you how to test if you're signalling obedience to the political tribe you have chosen to rule you. 

I'm not showing you which tribe is more worthy - all are governed by the same psychology. I'm showing you if you've chosen obedience over autonomy. 

The "Orwell Test" in Action

Here is how to take it: 

Take any policy that smells authoritarian and ask its defenders:

If the other side did this exact thing, would you call it Orwellian?
  • 90% will say yes.
  • 90% will then defend their side doing it.
That's not hypocrisy-it's tribal epistemology. 

The same brain that aces the 1984 quiz fails the 1984 stress test. There are many such tests which work the same way for different contexts.

This test has shown you how to test if you've given up part or all of your prior freedom so that you can be seen by the rest of the tribe as a loyal member. It shows if you are 'signalling obedience'. 

If you fail the test you will not be conscious of it. In fact, if you fail the test, you will deny its happening, with all your intellect. And your ego will convince you of your autonomy for the rest of the day.

If you pass the test you will simply accept the fact that you are doing it - you will have brought your shadow out into the open - a significant matter of personal development. The good news does not require 'acts'.

The motive for being seen as obedient is the biggest factor governing your success in the world you have chosen to believe in. Obedience far outweighs abstract principles such as truth, giving charity, having empathy. 

Obedience is the most powerful motive for you personally. Because if you do not signal your obedience well enough to your tribe, you risk exile from it. Which is tantamount to a death sentence eventually.

Am I just the hand, or the brain?


Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...