Skip to main content

What is Power?

What is power? It is the socially granted permission, for a select group, to discriminate against another class or group, with impunity, driven entirely by public opinion, and with these privileged rights protected fully by this opinion. Power is a safe space used to cause violence which the perpetrating group knows will not be prosecuted by the public.

I write this piece after engaging with a women's movement, rightfully, trying to protect women's safe spaces from the attacks of transgender activists. I fully back this movement but only to the extent that what they are trying to get a hearing on is true. I do not back the movement per se. Because they are perpetrating the same kind of violence they rail so bitterly about with the trans movement. Victims become perpetrators.

I asked this question about a nearly famous women leading the activity, who I actually admire after she had been attacked by someone with soup at a protest. [paraphrasing as I'm now blocked]

"You knew you would be attacked at some point. But you still proceeded anyway. Because you are trying to gain power more than you are trying to help women"

The response was typical and another interesting case history of victims perpetrating similar violence to what they had once received. From a mob of 50 or so followers screaming profanity and make allegations of me being a rapist. Normal stuff. 

There was no reasoning with them. After the usual going to great lengths to show my meaning and reasoning - which I might add was not what they were determined to falsely pin on me - was pro their movement but more importantly pro the people they claim to represent, the mob with so much power had screamed me down violently. Theres only so much reasoning thats worth doing with the possessed.

I failed to get far enough to show how not remaining authentic will cause more harm to women, than if they had never started the movement in the first place The quest for power always comes at a cost paid for by the victims in the end. Look what's happened to the original environmental movement, a basket case of corruption, which the poorest class are now paying for dearly.

The most curious allegation was that I was saying that women deserve the violence they get. This is one of their prime mantras used against trans rights activists. Of course this was attacking a straw man. I'm saying their ego demands publicity at these events in the hope of gaining power from it. Sure, at the beginning they were acting authentically. Alas, their bible does not discuss this. Only their own newspeak is permitted. The quality of attacks I received from this mob was quite uniform and poor quality, so not many smart people there. But it also had an admirable women's feel to it which I welcomed because it was different to the style you get from being attacked by a mens mob. I learned.

You know, that I know, this is the normal method for activists. The truth is that an activist's motives are driven by the ego, as a means to gain a shift in power from 'them', to 'us'. Nearly always as an escape from much more serious problems closer to home. The activist thus renders any violence they use into the unconscious and justifies the movement as a way to achieve the greater good in some shape or form.

The end goal is power, as a poor means to satisfy a suffering ego. 

It's curious. There are armies of activists from all cults and tribes trying to gain POWER. By pretending to be doing it to save some entity or other from oppression etc etc. But they only ever want POWER, even the small cults. This is unconscious activity so you cannot reason with it

I feel the motivation is from a lack of meaning in their lives since society killed God. I'm not religious BTW. So a quasi-religious cause becomes so attractive to fill the gap. God is dead. We have killed him. And with what will we wash our hands of all the blood. The ego washes the hands clean.

Once power has been secured, they always claim, it will be used for the greater good. Of course! In reality there are more people than is comfy to think about, who revel in watching the cruel destruction of others. THAT is power. And now this once excellent group are soon becoming perpetrators of violence themselves.

These movements always start out with a worthy cause. As power is conferred onto them, it's used to deal with perpetrators. As the group grows in public popularity, thus power, the desire for more of it becomes irresistible. Eventually power is all and the original cause is just the words of a new bible. 

It has gained enough power to be able to disable any further questioning of what is now a quasi-religious doctrine. It uses violence to quash any questions. Anyone asking a question is seen as a threat. Only people who preach from this new bible are not attacked. I won't say treated as partners because none of them seem to agree on much except the bible. 

The movement at inception cannot forecast this, because they are always stupid people. Who have found an ego tripping cause prior to attempting to look deep into their own psyche before proceeding on this untrodden path. They are like ground troops who think polishing a sword is more important than wielding it. 

Sadly these groups today represent all the world has to defend itself against the new state. Which itself is merely the greatest activist group of all with the most power.

I worry for the true victims of the world when this is all the protection they have. In the past 30 years of research and networking, all the actual victims I speak to despise activists who claim to be "here to help". Having suffered so greatly they recognise quickly this wasteland of inauthentic souls.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...