If You Have a High IQ You Know You Have No Choice But to Monetise Rent to Protect Your Household From the State
I know, for certain, that monetising rent and instead taxing hard work, skill and enterprise for government revenue instead, is root cause of poverty and great recession across the world. I do not agree with this policy. I'm telling you because a democratic majority of The People, largely of low IQ, have decided to make it the foundation of every economy. And the only way to protect your household from this and them is to exploit the situation, legally. Else your household will be at high risk.
This is a matter for high IQ. With a low IQ you will not be able to see the merit in it and will flail around with low IQ allegations of hypocrisy.
Understanding and acting on this policy is why wealthy people are wealthy. They own real estate, mostly. They have made the wise decision for their household: to defend it from the state and bad actors in the only way they can legally. The wise ones always look after their household as a first duty.
Real estate is untaxed, in the end, - it's the safest asset for a household to invest in - making it impossible to tax the wealthy - those with high IQ mostly own assets which are untaxed and understand this fully right away. High IQ people never mention it because low IQ people are jealous of wealth and hound them ridiculously, simply because they are jealous they made the wrong decision to remain low IQ. Low IQ people also stupidly call for the wealthy to be taxed more, yet are oblivious to the fact that it's impossible if the assets they own, real estate, are not taxed. The barmy thing is, low IQ people voted for it too. Can you see the Low IQ in action here - a neurosis in broad daylight?
This also means homeownership is 'democratised' - with 27 million households in the UK alone, each with 2.5 voters inside, represents a democratic majority who will never vote against it more than everything else. In the US there are a hundred million households. The only reason a household votes against private property in land is because they have a low IQ 'father' and a low IQ 'mother' looking after it.
And those with High IQ recognise quickly that private property in land is double dipping - 1) in the un-earned capital gain in selling price and 2) the imputed or actual annual rental earnings, both being about 5% of the property value Y/Y. Far more than a typical pension 401k. Far more than a typical small business can earn.
And even during a house price crash, though real estate assets fall by about 30%, everything else(that is, all capital assets) has already fallen in value far more. So real estate actually rises in value, relatively, during a real estate crash. Worse yet, capital will never regain the lost ground, often disappearing out of sight altogether. But house prices will soon proceed with their onward march during the certain recovery. This is the principle way in which most of a nations wealth is transferred systemically. Do not believe the bank haters. They are low IQ too and are quickly tempted to focus on superficial theories which help them 'escape' back' into low IQ territory.
The only time real estate prices, that is, the capitalized rental value of land, do not recover, is when that civilzation crashes. And then there will be far more to worry about. This does happen periodically. Given annual rental values are still rising over an extended period, we're OK for now. If rental value, aka location value, falls consistently for 50 years, then, we're in trouble.
This is why governments of all party's never go near policy on real estate, except to pussy foot around with it, pretending to do something - 'to be seen', such as with stamp duty or council tax. For a government to be serious about solving poverty they MUST confiscate 100% of the economic rents and abolish 100% of all taxation. There is no escaping it unless you are low IQ. If a politician were to even hint at it, they would be immediately unelectable for 20 years, of course. I know this with primary evidence - from sitting in Portcullis House with my MP in 2010 and having him tell me exactly that. The party making the law is irrelevant here. Private property in land and taxation of earned incomes is the only policy on which all party's agree in perfect harmony. But tacitly because they are all low IQ.
Then we have the lowest of the low phoney planet savers who tell us they came to save us yet do nothing to save us and collect huge wealth and power in the process - the only way the planet savers can beat this system is to confiscate your real estate property in its entirety - also known as socialist anarchist fascism. So beware, if you elect an anarchist, hard left or communist government- really beware! Not only will they confiscate the rent and selling price of your real estate, They will confiscate the property itself - you will effectively be a slave to the centralised state. And what's much worse still, they will keep taxing your hard work, skill and enterprise. You will be a slave of slaves. I laugh when I see a nationwide attack on Digital ID for example. Its such a tiny problem relatively. Those with low IQ are using it as an escape. Its similar to the psychopathy being wielded against the Jews about Palestine - when communist China kills more people daily and willingly admits it. But there is silence on that! I would be executed by China for this, ex juris, if I was a popular enough influencer. And this is why all influencers are low IQ too.
Yes, I hear you. Nearly half of the electorate already seem to be happy about this pathological policy arrangement. OK, so half the population is low IQ, I feel shame for Britain and the US it's true. We can see the low IQ voters 'running cover' for the crooks in the civil service and public sector, in exchange for the kind of 'protection' slaves have always got from their master - welfare job salaries, pensions, bread and circuses. So its curious to see how their opponents in the form of pundits are not pointing this out with clarity - if half the people of a nation want to destroy the future for our descendants, what will you do? - THAT is democracy for you. Are you proposing we overthrow it as we saw attempted by the exiting president in 2016?
You have no choice but to rise above this people led systemic corruption and find a way out. If you have High IQ you will know already it is to monetise the rents, knowing full well this policy will definitely bring down every economy. Your protection is that it's all perfectly legal. If you have low IQ you will remain or become poor. If you have High IQ and monetise the rents you stand a strong chance of surviving the flood with your family intact. People say this is not showing empathy for the poor. Wrong, it's showing that people with low IQ choose to remain with low IQ, deliberately. A free, often democratic choice. If you have particular sympathy for the poor 'on the earth' then you must also ask why do they deliberately choose it? And for the poor in spirit, that is a different and more pertinent matter.
This is why governments of all party's, during hard times, always bail out real estate first. In the trade this is known as 'front running'. The state do this for High IQ households as a free service. Households will be bailed out even before the banks. The rate at which you get the bail out depends on the proportion of real estate you own free from debt. Mortgages are the vehicle for this legalised and democratised Ponzi and have great utility here. But you really really don't want to be highly leveraged on mortgage when the inevitable financial crash hits overnight. A good rule of thumb is to have enough saved to pay 6 months mortgage rent and you will usually be able to hold out until the recovery comes. If you have High IQ.
So you see, blaming wealth and power for our problems is for those with low IQ. People with high IQ know it is The People who are complicit. He came to tell us this. And wealth and power - who The People willingly select every time, are merely their proxy, doing their bidding very well indeed. Those with the highest IQ of all recognise that under these extraordinary conditions the only way to protect their household is to monetise the rent - get real estate and Hold Onto it for Dear Life. To HODL real estate(hoddle). And all other forms of investment are for those with low IQ: losers, the wilfully ignorant and ultimately the poor.
Gaining a high IQ is a free choice. Not a social construct, nor something you were born with. Everyone one born can achieve a high IQ, IF, they deliberately choose it. Its a deliberate free choice to have a High IQ and to have a low IQ. At least half of the electorate choose to retain a low IQ. In simpler terms we can refer to them as 'slaves' in the most obvious sense - a slave always throws their own obligations onto the state - their earthly master, by free choice.
I know that monetising rent and instead taxing hard work, skill and enterprise for government revenue, is root cause of poverty and great recession across the world. I do not agree with this policy. I'm telling you this because a democratic majority of the people with low IQ have decided to use this policy systemically, so the only way to protect your household from them is to exploit it.
Notes
* This is not financial advice, it's a forecast based on learning how to remember the future.
* By low IQ I do not mean mentally handycapped people in any way. I mean anyone with all their capabilities, who makes poor decisions and projects their problems onto others when that strategy inevitably fails. So the standard for IQ tests is just an analogy which conveys meaning in the best way.
Comments
Post a Comment