Skip to main content

AI is Just Another Machine. So Why Are So Many Irrationally Scared of It?

 

Many people seem to be acting irrationally about AI with no literal supporting reasons for it. This is why they say that AI will one day become a conscious living autonomous entity.

What they really mean, but are saying in myth and symbol, is that a new group of people who benefit from it will use its benefits, but not for good reasons. They are absolutely correct to warn of this danger. But cannot say it literally because they are scared of being attacked for it or are seen to be complicit in the danger they point out so well. 

People are not really scared of it directly. They are pointing at the dangers they have witnessed many times before when enormous new found power is placed in the hands of other people.

Some people do not trust themselves yet to use the huge increase in productive power a new labour saving invention like AI brings to the world. But cannot say that directly for fear of harm or complicity.

Is it possible this mistake in thinking AI is conscious is people 'projecting' their internal anxieties onto it?

I'm not justifying their neurosis. But it explains a possible cause and effect of this irrational and widely held belief that AI will become conscious of itself and autonomous.

Large groups of people are terrified of AI, seeing it as a potentially sentient entity one day. Symbolically, these people are using this 'AI consciousness' as a myth to signal a real truth which cannot be told in any other way.

This real truth has nothing to do with AI itself. And everything to do with a danger which everyone understands by intuition.

So these apparently neurotic people are right. But they cannot speak directly about the danger, for various reasons - usually:

  1. they will be attacked for speaking about it directly or
  2. they are already complicit in the problem(shame and guilt)

So they use a myth, symbol or metaphor to point at the danger in safety.

What is this real danger they are so confident about yet cannot speak of directly?

In this case, it's that the people, as a collective, cannot be trusted to do the good with the enormous productive power of AI... yet. People know for certain that in the wrong hands this significant increase in economic power will certainly be used harmfully. 1) Maybe by others who will attack them for pointing at it or 2) Maybe by themselves with all the shame and guilt that will bring. 

History testifies well to this activity without exception. 

Because they cannot speak about this directly for reasons 1) and 2) , they create a myth about it from within an unconscious social sanctuary zone.

This is why so many people seem to be acting irrationally about AI with no literal supporting reasons for it. This is why they say that AI will one day become a conscious living autonomous entity.

What they really mean is that a new group of people who benefit from it will use its benefits, but not for good reasons. They are absolutely correct to warn of this danger. But cannot say it literally because they are scared from being attacked for it or are seen to be complicit in the danger they point out so well.

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...