Skip to main content

There is No Cabal of Wealth and Power. The People Themselves ARE the Cabal.


Why is it so hard for people to accept that wealth and power are less of a problem, than the collective of people on the whole - is something much deeper going on, which nobody is willing to grasp hold of?

Experiment with this question down at the pub later on this evening. The intent is not a judgement call. It is experimental - to find out who among your friends really wants to know. And who wants to climb high among this secret protected people's cabal - The Peoples Front.

Ask any or all of the following:
  1. "The people on the whole are more corrupt than wealth and power. And the more the people become corrupt the more easily the worst among them rise to the top - what do you think?"
  2. "Why must the people have a powerful figure to lead and protect them everywhere in life? Would using one's autonomy, by doing things in one's own right, not be better for the people as persons?"
  3. "Homeowners are the wealthiest constituency in the world today. The real estate they own collectively is worth more than all other assets combined. Homeowners are at least as much part of a solutions as are the bankers - if you disagree, give me your numbers"
  4. "There are 73 million abortions every year in the world, more than all other causes of death combined. How many would be too many before triggering the people into authentic dialogue on it? Pro choice or pro life matters little - what matters is that the people are definitely running cover for it"
  5. "The democratic majority of the UK people are running cover for the systemic child rape gangs. But why? Is it because they have fantasised about their own children at least once and the shame and guilt of that means it's too hard to bring the rape gang inquiry under proper scrutiny?"
  6. "People everywhere, are much better off today, per capita, than in all of history, in spite of a growing population. So why are so many people exhibiting deep anxiety there is still not enough to go around?"
  7. "The distribution of wealth has not changed since the dawn of civilisation. Yes it's always been unjustly distributed, but the proportions have not changed except around the margins. So why do people collectively say things are getting much worse?
  8. There has never been a genuine famine since civilisation started ten thousand years ago. The illusion of famine is a grotesque political activity by one large collective of the people, blocking another's access to the abundant food. That is all a famine actually is. 
  9. "Slavery has never truly existed. Captured groupings of working people have always possessed the opportunity to run to the free land but chose not to for rational reason - they were always better off as slaves loyal to a master (see 2 above). How does your gut feel about this?"
  10. "The people of the UK have more wealth than 99% of the world's population. But a smaller amount relatively compared to others in their own country. Why are they still jealous of those with more wealth when they already have plenty? Why do they care that billionaires have so much, isn't that a good thing? Do the poorest of the world think it's a good thing that the people of the UK have more than them?"
  11. More people are killed by their own people during peace time than the enemies they kill during wars. Isn't this a perfect exposition of a 'Cabal of The People'?
  12. Killing a million people indirectly with a vaccine is seen collectively as 'tolerable'. An immigrant killing one person directly on the street with a knife is not. Because for the enormous indirect death toll, no one in particular seems to be responsible. And the foreign immigrant who kills directly makes for excellent political capital. Is this the mindset of a 'Cabal of The People' ?
I promise you will not get past any one question in the pub. The approach of responders will be to use whatever intellect they can muster to shut down the question rather than use it to respond authentically and openly. A strong signal reinforcing my initial proposition.

Take care here. Vet whoever you are asking. More than half will want to hurt you physically from deep down just for asking these questions. 

Labels:

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...
Read more

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...
Read more

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...
Read more