Skip to main content

Can Land Be Stolen?

Can land be stolen? Only in the eyes of the law. And the law is not inherently justice. It is just the law.

In the final analysis, the law is Power masquerading as justice. Whichever is the most powerful authority in that time and place, is, the law. That is all. Morals and ethics might contribute but they're just nice-to-haves as the entirety of history testifies to very clearly.

This becomes critically important to a civilisation once it has become secular, thinking it has risen above nature*. Once there's no longer a higher order of so called justice to moderate our obedience** in an unknown after life, how do you think things will play out for that civilisation?

Something can only be stolen, if it was owned in the first place. Do we all agree? If not, we cannot proceed.

For example, we're told that so called private property can be owned - the earnings of hard work or the capital savings in a business. But isn't this just a legal construct too and what does nature say about it?

But land feels like something deeper and more important than private property in your earned incomes - is land even something anyone has worked to create, given it has always been there and they're not making any more of it?

Then there is the idea of your rights in the market - when you buy something does that presuppose that it is then owned by you? Buying something is an agreement to exchange one thing for another, usually with money on one side of the exchange because it's more efficient. And that agreement and ownership is protected, usually by the force of the state. Who else will protect it?

So when you buy something - land or private property, all you have is a bundle of rights which the state promises to protect. Can you say you own it, do you need to own it. What utility is lost from it because you do not own it. Does ownership add any value to the thing? You already have exclusive possession which is everything you need to max out it's value in use or value in exchange. 

Beware: I'm not saying that ownership is a right or a wrong thing. I am trying to bring scrutiny onto the idea for the first time, without judgement driven by either side.

There are no guarantees - if the land of a so called nation is successfully invaded, what used to be protected is quickly lost to the greater power of the invader. Who will then proceed to institute their own forms of flaky protections and privileges which still oppose nature.

Nature has made no agreement to uphold your man made rights. Weakling man made power can only make a tacit promise to you without insurance. Yes, we can quote 'natural law' and say it harmonises with nature. But this is just the philosophical and intellectual masturbation commanded by the current authority hoping you won't see the illusion and remain obedient to them.

So all you have with your rights to ownership of anything at all, are what the present authority in power promises, but does not guarantee to protect, in exchange for your obedience.

How often does this hallowed law of ownership controlled by authority harmonise with nature? Never. Nature knows nothing about ownership of the material world. Nature mocks it.

All you can say is that private property in earned incomes is probably fairer, than is private property in land, the ownership of which has never been earned because it's always been there. 

So can land be stolen? Only in the eyes of the law - which as we've discussed, is not inherently justice. Nature knows nothing about ownership, even of land. So how can it be stolen?

Remember Me: "If you oppose me, nature, expect the heat of fire and the stroke of the sword - power"

*NOTE: I have no idea what nature is in totality. All I can say about it is that it encompasses the whole of the universe, both materially and metaphysically - everything.

**NOTE: God does not want your obedience, but your autonomy. Religion has made this observation impenetrable to most people - religion insists on you obeying God, a terrible mistake and a limited earth bound power structure no less. To me, religion and God are mutually exclusive. Religion is an obedience structure, to hold onto power. God is not power, but the embodiment of your own autonomy. 

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...