Skip to main content

Crush Big Tech

Dr. Craig Wright was silenced by COPA last year in the UK's High Courts. By those who could not allow his idea to proceed. 

Imagine an electronic cash system with:

  • ultra high transaction scale - millions of txs/sec
  • micropayments - payments as low as 1/1000th of a cent
  • tiny fees - $0.001 compared to high fee bank created money in the end
  • perfect security - no need for banks to check a payment before you can spend it
  • pseudonymous - spender remains private, while crime can still be traced and followed by law enforcement. (AML etc)
  • 'sauce for the goose' - both crime and the state will be equally publicly visible in fraudulent transactions for all to see
  • while leaving private banking with plenty of daily free market business

Imagine how this would flip the present fully monopolised  Internet business model(social media, big tech) and those who control it overnight if adopted? 

Use your imagination here right now... no longer would a product being free mean *you* ARE the product, along with your guaranteed loss of privacy. 

e.g. simple example of which there are many others - each request to a website on your browser would be auto charged from your wallet at say 1/1000th of a cent. Big tech no longer gets paid by advertisers. Content is now content, not adverts. Miners and merchants doing all the work get paid instead - FOR THEIR WORK. 

Finally economic justice.

Of course, the crooked state had to crush this opportunity, it's donors would lose everything. 

Is this yet more systemic crime being 'handled' by a well funded and crooked state - are we the people, determined to keep suffering by electing crooks at every opportunity, when we know they are not funded by taxation, assuring ourselves the result will be suffering?

For expert consulting on the topic contact@tohonesty.com.
Labels:

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to Indicate Countries of the UK Are Open to Accede to the US

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious conversation to addres...
Read more

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...
Read more

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...
Read more