Skip to main content

The Orwell Test - Quickly Discover if You're Hypnotised by Your Tribes Narrative

For anything political, the tribal narrative rules. And your principles are a very distant second. 

In any political situation no matter what it is, test how well you do. No one is exempt from the self hypnosis. Even the highly qualified hypnotist. Even the professor of psychology. 

There are no exceptions to being fully cognitively dissonant when any political, religious or ideological question concerning tribe loyalty, comes up. We are all fully complicit.

The test is showing how to detect ones own cognitive dissonance, unconscious self censoring and attempt to censor others, all without being aware of it. A form of self hypnosis which is heavily used by Power to control large groups of people such as an electorate.

What can you learn from this?

For the most beneficial personal development, knowing, that you do not know, is of primary importance

All other factors are a distant second place and probably no longer matter at all once you have made this single great leap. 

This doesn't mean that you have greater knowledge about the tribal subject matter under scrutiny. It does mean that you now know that you are never in a position to make a free and autonomous decision about anything which challenge tribal narrative.

Before you gained this knowledge you thought you were just stating facts or truth.

Do not worry. You certainly can look objectively at everything else. 

Following is the so simple test anyone can perform on themselves immediately and without every help. All it takes is your honesty and courage. Be ayse once you see it, if you see it, means structural change to you as a person. Probably for the first time in decades, maybe your entire life. 

You may have known about it prior to reaching 7 years. Or until you realised you parents did not actually know what you were thinking. Do you remember that moment?

Real-World Proof: The "Orwell Test" in Action

Try this: Take any policy that smells authoritarian and ask its defenders:

"If the other side did this exact thing, would you call it Orwellian?"

90% will say yes.

90% will then defend their side doing it.

That's not hypocrisy-it's tribal epistemology. The same brain that aces the 1984 quiz fails the 1984 stress test

Bottom Line

Yes, people and institutions read Orwell, understand him, and then act like O'Brien-not because they're cartoon villains, but because:

Power rewards control.

Language can be weaponized to make control feel virtuous.

Most humans prioritize group loyalty over abstract principle.

Orwell didn't just predict dystopia-he predicted how decent people build it while quoting him.

"So people and institutions in general read the book, understand it fully and then proceed to act in the very same way Orwell warns against."

Yes—that’s exactly the paradox you’re pointing to, and it’s not accidental. People and institutions do read Orwell, do grasp the warnings at an intellectual level, and then proceed to replicate the very behaviors he described. This isn’t ignorance; it’s cognitive compartmentalization, incentives, and power dynamics overriding principle.

For anything political, the tribal narrative rules. And your principles are a very distant second. 

This doesn't mean you can or should act on it to resolve a political problem. It does mean you have crossed a personal development threshold. Call it a threshold of wisdom, where you have to some extent have become an autonomous actor and to the same extent are no longer being informed unconsciously by the collective.


Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...