Skip to main content

Wealth is no good to me. I want your land!

Inequality is not about those who have more wealth and those who have less wealth. It's about those who have more land and those who have less land.

In a book called "Progress and Poverty," Henry George argues that advancements like technological progress, government improvements, and corporate growth, AI, EV's, while seemingly beneficial, ultimately lead to increased land value and exacerbate inequality. 

He contends that these improvements, rather than benefiting society as a whole, primarily enrich landowners through increased rent, and the capital gains from that, further concentrating wealth and contributing to poverty and the artificial need for a welfare state. And ultimately war, where the land of other nations is now required to remain above water.

What are the mechanics of this? Well, all improvements of any kind increase economic productivity, and then the desire to live and produce in the location where productivity is the highest, or higher relatively. This new demand for land which is fixed in supply must mean it's value rises to the same extent. 

It's not rocket science. Curiously no economist, politician or religious person, nay, no person who wants to 'get on' will go near this basic observation that even a small child can see clearly. Anyone who tries to make a stand on it will lose their friends, their reputation, their career, their high seat. And possibly a place on the right hand side of god.

Here lies root cause of all social problems. What seems so hard to solve is simply a matter of a change of mind. Or more like, an evolution. From that of psychotic primordial existential survival behaviours. To an attitude that says, "how high might we climb, we no longer fear shortages of anything or sudden death". 

Though some existential problems still do exist, they are relatively tiny now compared to yesterday and pale into insignificance. Sure, it doesn't feel like this does it? Well thats only because we keep thinking with a primordial mind as The People - thus we keep repeating the same old cave man like mistakes which cause it to seem that way. We are still primitive people. Huge productivity, even by Elon, does not rescue us from that mental health position. Evidently!

Most people scoff at this by saying, these are ancient matters and no longer apply. But this is a mistake. Yes, they are ancient matters - this is my whole point, we are choosing not to evolve. People believe that evolution is an increase in productive power, but never talk about the higher things that have not increased at all. The cause and effect has intensified, so much so, that it only 'appears to be' fundamentally different today. Our view of the world has been blurred and rendered invisible by the staggeringly grotesque scale of it nowadays, that is all.

Yet it's identical. No longer is it enough to appropriate rent from your neighbours. It must be gotten from other races and cultures or whomever has it is all that drives us. The incredible stupidity of woke culture is merely helping blur our vision that much further. Watch China, America, Europe as it plays out. Nothing in the slightest has changed fundamental for 10,000 years. We have failed to evolve. And seem to be getting more and more stupid. We are failing, as The People, consistently to find the strength to elect leadership. 

Holding a leaders seat, does not make you a leader. There has only been one authentic leader and He exists only in myth and symbol to The People today - we killed Him because he was pointing all of this out with superb clarity. It was not the Jews, though we persecute them today in another cowardly escape, especially the atheists curiously.

So the systemic pathology proceeds, apace, in spite of incredible productive power where the poor no longer really exist except in those locations where the people remain in denial of this or are victims of invasion for their land in the old way. 

Circular reasoning. Or is it a kind of mental illness which infects whole nations? No matter what their creed colour or race.

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...