Skip to main content

How Do I Choose What I Believe?

Ask yourself this question, and don't give up until you are more certain about it than you were before you were asked: 

how do I choose what I believe in?

I was looking at the moon last night. It's an amazing sight. The atmosphere makes it difficult to see in its full self because it is blurred somewhat and looks slightly artificial. And I cannot see it in a way that convinces me it is there. Nonetheless, I believe it is there as we are taught, totally. If anyone tells me its just a 'Truman Show' I would see them as dangerous.

But, likewise, if the same person were to say to me "so prove it is really there then - prove it!", I would be totally at a loss. I cannot prove it. All I can do is express a belief it is there 250 thousand miles away. A belief being something which someone else already believes in and has told me to believe in too! In an infinite regression of beliefs since the first genetic belief. 

12 astronauts landed on the moon we are told and I believe this. The astronauts hold the genetic knowledge which they pass on to me and this I receive as a belief that it actually happened. What I now have is a belief the astronauts landed on the moon. It is not knowledge I have not experienced it myself. I have not seen it myself. I am compelled to take it on faith.

The only way I could know the moon is true, would be to travel there and touch it. There are only 12 people in all of history who claim to have done this. And though I believe them, again, I still rely on a received belief that they actually did it - that what they are telling me to believe they did, is true. That is all I have. A belief.

So we're presented with a challenge - that everything is a belief. And the question about if beliefs are knowledge. And if there's a difference between the two, observing it is a form of knowledge in itself. A genetic knowledge which anyone can deduct independently of out outside help. 

Knowing this small piece of knowledge by myself, could be seen as more than I knew about anything important before. The first time I recognised something myself without requiring the assistance of beliefs. 

A belief in something, does not mean I know about something - that I have knowledge. I am just believing what someone else tells me to believe, is true. Knowing something for certain, no matter how small that thing is, has a transforming potential for me. Because I have seen for the first time, for certain, there is a higher order of understanding in life, which if I so choose, I can nurture for the benefit of my world.

Many times a day, I go through a decision making process about what I 'believe' is true, things which are real to me, actualities. I do this to help me get through everyday life, to plan for the future, and to determine what about my past was a virtue or a mistake and caused me or someone else good or harm.

Seems like a good thing right?

But how can I be sure what I believe is actual? What things do I use to cross check what I believe in, is actually true?

Well, hardly anything. Most of what I believe in is decided unconsciously and intuitively. My final decision will be primarily informed by unconscious activity. Does this make me any different to the great masse of people... the democratic majority?

Here is a list of things I could use to decide on what is real, I might not be using them, but they are things I can think of that I have used in the past when I'm trying to find out about something or looking for meaning. I've listed them in order of priority of knowledge or certainty.

Are there any others? Which ones have the most merit. Does it actually matter if I cannot know about everything I would like to know about?

  1. knowledge: what I can 'see' in front of my face
  2. beliefs: ideology, worldview, religion, cult, politic, science
  3. fear
So what can one say about beliefs and what we all really know for certain. When everything we think we know, is just... a belief?

I'm not saying beliefs are good or bad. I am saying that is all they are... beliefs. They are not knowledge. And this doesn't mean beliefs are not useful. Most beliefs have a great deal of utility. That is, believing some things at face value can be very useful in day to day life.

But there are also, equally, beliefs I can have which if acted on, are very harmful to me and the world around me. With beliefs, there is always a risk analysis or cost benefit analysis to be done, because beliefs are not knowledge but guesses. And I 'believe' we all do this intuitively for everything we believe in, in everyday life. 

There are other things we think about more carefully and out in the open. But these are merely coloured by other things we already believe in, in an infinite regression and we call this activity politics, religion or teaching. We're more careful with these things because they have the potential for material gain. I confess,  I never use this pathway to think about a higher order of gain.

So how do I decide between which beliefs are good, and which are bad? I simply do not know this. Nor does anyone else know. So other people certainly cannot teach me about them, though many do for material gain - look at all the celebrity guru's no matter how kind they seem. Avoid the guru's at your peril. The allegory of Jesus as a teacher or guru is a mistake because it makes him out as merely a passer on of beliefs. Jesus IS the teaching - the teacher IS the teaching. He IS this knowledge. Or put another way, a higher order of understanding about the world and the potential that has for transformation - the evolution of man.

All I can know for certain is very little indeed. That might not matter in everyday life. And usually that little is perfectly good enough for anyone to lead a really good life. Because prior to gaining that tiny amount of knowledge, all I had was beliefs.

The problems start, and accelerate quickly into a positive feedback loop, when thought informs me that what I believe is TRUTH. Because then I will start trying to force others to believe in what I believe in, on pain of social exclusion, growing into the law, or death through war even. 

THIS is where all the worlds social problems are rooted - just beliefs.

So how do you choose what you believe in?

Popular Posts

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A thread on dystopia, Milgram and breaking the agentic state: why people act irrationally, and often violently, when a tribal social structure and its hierarchy are brought under serious scrutiny. This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding. Why this matters This piece grew out of a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit, and I was astonished at the intelligence it produced. What follows is the most pertinent part of that exchange, tightened up. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. Orwell only sets the scene for what comes later: the agentic state, and how power uses it to control the masses. It may not have all the answers. It might be wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system-wide dissonance we all live in, and take part in, better than any of the alternatives. So it deserves your continued attention. By al...

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

I want the government to start a conversation: could the countries of the United Kingdom leave the UK and join the United States as individual states? Let us call the idea UKEXIT—pronounced “yukezit”. This petition asks us to examine what that could mean for people's lives: their rights, prosperity, identity and future. It is a proposal for dialogue, not immediate change. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland or England left the UK, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . As separate US states, they would govern themselves within the federal system and receive its protection. Immediate change is unlikely. But the disconnect in UK leadership calls for a serious conversation. The government should honestly help the public compare ways of governing and think harder about nationalism, patriotism and multiculturalism—and what each leaves to our descendants. Why consider it? What could improve? What happens if we do nothing? Concl...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And it’s deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your f...

The Orwell Test

I'm going to show you how to test if you're either: an autonomous individual, or an obedient instrument of authority We all believe we make our choices with free will. And that thought is just telling us how things are.  Yet in making 'free' choices are we actually signalling obedience to the political tribe we have chosen to rule us and are unconscious of it?  Do not get drawn back into the unconscious and think: "well I'm somewhere in between, I do a little bit of obedience here and a little bit of autonomy there." It is not a relative activity. It is a binary one at the root. One has either submitted one's autonomy to a Master, or one has not.  At the root of one's psyche. And once the root has been overwhelmed all else is lost that follows. But if one can fight to defend the root divine spark, everything is resolved. Sure, you might be attacked by a psychopath one day and this didn't help did it. But we're talking about the rediscoverin...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado - The Coming Great Recession

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle always culminating in a financial crisis and great recession. This is not a prediction or a prophet speaking. It is saying it will happen - a forecast. I've been saying 2026 for 15 years now. I might be wrong about the exact date. Give or take a year. The 18.6 year astronomical period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this and had been measuring it for aeons. And the politicians of the time used it to name the day when the economy had to be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because they noticed around 19 years is as long as an economy can sur...

Mortgages, For the Greater Good

I'm going to tell you about how mortgages have evolved into a neodemocratic political tool,  that mortgages harmonise all political parties meaning it doesn't matter who you vote for any more,  why the homeowner never funds bank bailouts and the saver or tenant always does. And of course, the effects of this on 2026 and how to prepare your household for the next great recession. Source: UK Ministry of Justice At a property network event a property manager told me recently how they'd made it with multiple properties through the past two business cycles in 89 and 08. But didn't know or had forgotten how. And how their old boss who took more risk and had way to many bonds on his books, had not made it, because he was trying to be super wealthy - 'the bad manager'. I suggested the property manager had survived well because he'd not got greedy. He had not got over-leveraged on mortgage debt. And that government of all party's will implicitly protect the mortg...

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this blog about?  This blog tells you all about my cosmic exile ,  my propensity to obey authority above all other social actions and how I tend to project my darker side onto the world to escape from all this - to prevent it from coming into the light. The blog will tell me how this is manifest in the material world in my daily activity, in the form of forbidden knowledge. This knowledge is available all the time and is all around me yet I'm not permitted to speak it about without risking further  exile from the tribe.  Because in the end, we are all suffering from being born in to the same condition - a condition of cosmic exile. Each post will attempt to present the good news - that by doing the inner work I can redeem myself from all this, immediately, if I choose it, and so can we all. Instead of fueling more chaos and incoherence in the world.  I can't be more specific on the subject matter. Because it covers everything which happens on the ...

Recovery of Lost and Stolen Bitcoin Is Easier Than Ever

What if my stolen assets are mixed and dispersed into a thousand wallets. How can you possibly get that back for me? For a quick analysis see the FAQ here tohonesty.com I sometimes get asked this question by smart people genuinely interested in how the method works. It's about trying to understand how we can still recover your assets easily, even after a thief spreads your stolen assets out so widely, it feels like it's now impossible to recover.  The answer is the same in all cases. Because crypto in the eyes of the law is identical in every way to all other forms of property, the recovery method will use the same existing well known techniques. One does not have to go into the precise mechanics of it, legal experts and analysts already know.  The question is really about 'money laundering' and how to overwhelm the attempt by bad actors to hide the stolen assets from the law. Money laundering has been a scam method since the dawn of time. So any remediation will be th...

Introducing Obedience Theory

Let me put forward an idea that might be new to you. We'll call it 'obedience theory'. At its core, the theory explains how obedience serves as the main way people climb socially and economically. You can dig into the articles on this site for a proper deep dive. In any society built on hierarchy - and they all are - obedience underpins every decision we make. Other factors play a role in our social drives, but they're far less important. They're just theatrical offshoots of obedience. Choosing Your Tribe As a citizen, I will pick obedience to the authority that spins the tale I most want to hear. That's my tribe. I give it my obedience as the key thing to advance socially and economically. Of course, I do other stuff to get ahead. But obedience tops the list by miles.  Public displays of obedience to my tribe - what I call 'signalling' - trump everything else in social and economic terms. This even beats out abstract principle values like objective fact...

Global National Socialism & Saving Human Consciousness

I'm going to tell you about Global National Socialism (GNS)  GNS is a worldview and political movement which sees a single party and a single nation as the optimal condition for social organisation. Some refer to it as globalism though that is too weak a description. Think about the national socialists of 1930's Germany and you will have a better idea about what it means, though it won't look much like that on the surface, more like the Soviet Union and probably something like neither. Some might call it 'omni-socialism'. It's a state of the world where there's a single nation, run by a single party, with a single all encompassing worldview of obedience . Whatever is becomes it will be systemically authoritarian with centralised control of everything. It's not dumb to call it nationalism, in spite of being a global authority. It is one nation where everything is driven by a cult of national superiority. A nation of ideal people, only. Not ideal in race, ...