Skip to main content

The Money

In economic terms, what do we call the most exchanged thing?

That is, for the trillions of transactions that take place daily, exchanging one thing for another, out of all those trillions of exchanged things, what do we call the most exchanged thing?

It doesn't matter what form it takes, whatever it is that is the most exchanged thing, what do we call it?

Money! By money, I mean THE money. Which all people everywhere use in exchanges more than any other thing, without needing to test its source for validity before accepting it in exchange for another thing. Eventually it will be adopted as legal tender, if not deliberately by fiat at inception already.

The money, out of all exchanged things, is THE most exchanged thing. And this quality is what makes it the money above all other qualities. If you hear a pundit, professor or politician say anything to the contrary, ignore them immediately to protect your household.

But The Money does not have to be adopted officially, per se. If government is no longer trusted enough, the money will simply emerge underground, as the new form of most exchanged thing. And will be used by the people just as effectively notwithstanding government power.

This is why the myth of the dangers of CBDC's are held so strongly by stupid people who neither think nor listen. If government control of the money is satisfactorily handled for the great mass of people, it will be accepted by the people, as the money no problem. If.

Imagine this: let us say that today a trillion transactions take place across the economies of the whole of the world. For each transaction, two people come together, both perfectly happy with the deal and in total agreement, to exchange one thing for another thing. For else the transaction will not take place! In 99.999% of these transactions(-1,000,000), money will have been the thing exchanged on one of the two sides. And the counter party who receives the money in exchange for whatever of the billion other kinds of things that get exchanged today, will say "Thank You!". Because they want the money to make a corresponding exchange for another kind of thing, that they really want more than the money, sometime later on.

So the money, is not wealth, as most people who have yet to think, believe. Money is not something which human exertion created, as is all of wealth. If people on the whole think money is wealth, can you imagine the chaos in policy making by their leaders, who always do exactly what the people want? And so it goes...

Analysed more closely, each of these trillion transactions that take place today, are really 'half-exchanges'. A full exchange is where 2 things which are not the money get completely exchanged across several trades. It is not the money we want. It is the things we can buy with the money that we really want. These 2 things we really want will always be material objects created by inputs of labour and capital or for skills and services rendered in the former - real world things which require exertion of some kind - the things we really really want. There are no exceptions to this golden rule. The money is just an idea - a very great idea. Sure, we create 'tokens' made of metal, paper and digits to give the idea of money the utility spoken of above - to 'oil' the trillion exchanges. A very big utility, probably the biggest utility of all. But these material world tokens are just a proxy for the idea of the money itself - tokens! The money is real, only in the psychic sense. It does not exist on earth. Just like God's will is not done on earth.

So the actuality is that the most exchanged form of token, rather than the most exchanged thing, is what becomes the money, in this time and place. Whatever form it takes in this time and place is irrelevant. All it needs is to be is the most exchanged token, to be the money.

If tomorrow, in our thought experiment, another class of things emerges which is used in 49.999% of transactions (leaving 50.001% of transactions made using the money) this will still not make it another form of the money. Because it will still not be the most exchanged thing, so will still not be accepted as the money, by the great mass of people. This new highly exchanged thing may do many other things, but the people will still not accept it as the money.

It doesn't matter what other qualities the pundits, professors and politicians demand about the money that it must have: metal; paper; crypto; ones and zeros; fresh air. If it's not the most exchanged thing, it is not the money.

Go Well! 

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...