Skip to main content

The 2026 Great Recession - What Will Trigger it and Who Will be Blamed?


Robin Smith, The SFR Group, Cambridge UK.

I'm going to tell you about how the next systemic shock will play out sometimes in 2026. What was root cause. And how governments will recover it. Primary cause once again is speculation in real estate by homeowners. With a lot of help from commercial banks. And all held together by fundamental, if not latent economic policy of nations. Caveats: the crypto triggers at the begging and the pressure riptions for recovery at the end on the slide are just me speculating. Its a strong possibility due to the crypto mania many are bought into especially in fintech. Though whatever is the trigger of the financial shock, it will be something, and it will happen. 

Following the shock and to catalyze recovery, the authorities and media will very heavily scapegoat a well know character or business sector, to cover up the principle cause - the voter. Obviously redemption of the voter is the only way to get re-elected following the shock so that recovery policy can even take place in any meaningful way. Last time the scapegoats were mostly the banksters and Bernie Madoff of course.


I'm also speculating about what will be used to recover things once the authorities have re-gathered themselves in a sensible enough way to be able to act once again. 


The original blockchain protocol as the ecash micro payments system it was always meant to be, if it ever gets adopted, which is highly unlikely, will be an astonishing labour saving device because it disintermediates payments fully, while retaining privacy and security, at scale. The banksters already hate this possibility even though it would give them a much more profitable business model if they adopted it properly. Central banks love it (CBDC) because it allows them to intro a digital form of the old cash and maintain control over monetary policy for the foreseeable future, while presently this is at risk. 


Likewise for the LVC(our think tanks principle policy proposal) to help homeowners from going under or to get a house at all when the system has long ago been sent to the deep. The LVC basically exchanges the mortgage asset for the location value of the property as a perpetual rental stream. This is financed by the state printing a promissory note to the commercial bank they can use as 'capital reserves assurance' in their current account with the BofE. Much in the same way as furlough, but into commercial banks deposit accounts held at the central bank, rather than central bank cash to an individual's deposit account. In the end this means the private individual maintains ownership of their land or castle full capitalist style, but the rent, or the fraction of it they needed to give up to afford the house, is now available for use for public services. The possibility now arises for the inherently unjust social institution of taxation to be phased out over time, to the extent the LVC’s are taken up by the people. The LVC is ‘democratised’ by being a voluntary policy instrument available to every voter - they can take it up, or leave it and take their chances with the incumbents. Adoption of the LVC is not in the least bit forced by fiat. And its enforcement once each location plot is committed to it, certainly will be, by the law - essentially putting an end to tax evasion(or revenue) - you cannot move a piece of land ex juris! So its adoption will be a matter for the people to decide under free conditions. Its proponents will see that finally, what they pay to the state is for the benefits they directly receive from the value of the location itself - they will have been cured of blindness economically. Rather than the injustice of their ability to pay in tax regardless of how much they get in exchange for that which is nearly always much less.


Financial shocks are always caused by mortgages historically(about 90% of all bank loans, which few are willing to discuss, especially activists with large houses or anyone really in a privileged socialist position). No one can prove why this always is the case scientifically, business cycles are too stochastic, there is only theory, and good theory but not proof. There are a few who claim the shock is priced in at the start of each cycle of around every 20 years, by allowing the enclosure of the economic rent of a nation in location values. If this is true, a shock is obviously inevitable. Because you cannot take more out of the system than its creating, without it eventually being sent down. It’s a latent and legalised ponzi scheme where the people are convinced that so long as they keep paying in, they will get much higher rewards in house price eventually. But only a few come out winners and these are usually the ones there at the start who understand the rules of the game or were given a lucky handout(inheritance usually). Leadership and activists are very well aware of this but tend not to mention it because a lifetime of campaigning is immediately shot down. These groups and movements will just keep focusing on superficial and high sounding causes in finance, which certainly has a big role to play in each collapse, it’s just not at the root of it. Well, neither are mortgages in the end, but that true root is a matter of metaphysics.Economically though its at the root of it. I believe this system wide denial is because we all have snouts buried deep, and if this is revealed openly... pastoral care certainly is required to complement the prophetic memory of what the future will certainly deliver!


Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...