Skip to main content

Why do I get angry when someone is horrible to me? I could just ignore them and carry on no harm done.

Have you ever come across anyone, or even yourself, who has asked the following question? I ask because it feels like it fits into 'field theory'.

"Why do I get angry when someone is rude to me? Or, is unkind to me in any number of other ways, all the way up to and including a physical attack?"

Seems like a strange question right? 

But I'm asking very seriously about it. Because my anger in response is a choice I freely made. I could have made an alternative choice which is to laugh or ignore it. Or simply not to have got angry and carried on as usual. 

There reason I ask and why I feel it's important, is because social organisation stands fully behind our 'right' to be angry when someone is horrible to us. Society does not say "just ignore it, its just words". And now we have hate law reinforcing what society already backs up.

I'm not saying I agree or disagree with the behaviours of both sides in such an interaction. I'm asking because I want to know why it happens, in the material sense, not the moral one. 

Is there a scientific name for this? Maybe Rupert Sheldrake knows and has already discussed it. 

Is there a 'field' which is distorted when people try to project harm onto others by making them angry. And the anger is a natural force response correcting the field back into its normal shape. Does this fit in with the morphic field?

The trigger which caused me to ask further, is that I have put the question to trusted friends. And I get a fierce response instead of a logical or scientific dialogue. Followed by an allegation that I am too provocative with people and its true what they've heard about me. 

That kind of response, is a clear signal something very important is happening. Some kind of forbidden or secret knowledge, which may or may not need defending by nature and for good reason maybe.

But, what is it, exactly?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

COPA and Dr Craig Wright's Highly Principled Autistic Journey

If you are very bored and like reading High Court written judgements, follow this link .  https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/COPA-v-Wright-Judgment.pdf  Warning: It is not pretty and paints the defendant in a very poor light. I'm not convinced with the ruling, largely because it follows the collective narrative so perfectly and feel the judge may well be unconsciously supporting it being unaware of the shenanigans we all know have been happening.  To be fair to the judge Wright failed, deliberately or because he had no choice for some proximate reason, to show any convincing evidence. The judge knew this pre trial and was kindly giving Wright an opportunity during the trial to deliver.  Wright could well be a serial forger or the unluckiest man alive. My view is that due to an important new point of law on property rights, to do with linking identity to the crypto assets, meaning that crypto assets are identical in nature to any other property in law...

Executive Summary of the Modern World

...and the imaginary rumours we still create to remind us life is all about survival  We still possess primordial inherited instincts Which tell us about constant impending dangers Our ancient ancestors used them as a survival tool in an environment which was constantly dangerous And with the advent of social organisation these existential threats disappeared Yet we still possess the instinct, like it remains in our DNA. And as a substitute for real danger we create imaginary danger, to fill the gap. This survival instinct still drives us as a primary function. Because it gives our lives meaning. More meaning than religions, fame or fortune. Much more. The drive is unconscious so we cannot be aware of it's powerful driving force This means there is no scientific analysis, logic nor reason which can attend to it It's also a collective activity making it quite remote for individual action to identify and act upon So what is the result of this artificial separation of ancient inhe...

On Freedom, its Obligations and Society's Preference for Slavery

This piece is going to talk about my preference for slavery over freedom. And how and why I try to hide my preference from public view. The meaning of freedom and how self awareness fails to interact with it? I talk a lot about freedom lately and it's clear I do not understand the meaning of the term I spout so boldly. Curiously, I quickly lose my confidence when the meaning of freedom is brought under proper scrutiny. Yet I'm not self aware enough to confess to that observation of ignorance at depth. Why is it hard for me to observe my ignorance and selfishness, especially when I want to be seen by society as a good, honest, law abiding citizen? There must be a deep psychological reason which is forbidden knowledge for the politics, science and economics driving society and its so called freedoms. I cite society as being close to the root and a driving force because I constantly seek validation from it more than anything else. Even family. Freedom and obligation are mutually i...