Skip to main content

People NEED existential threats, even if imaginary ones, to find meaning


How society mitigated existential threat

Human life used to be under threat daily from many sources. 

Existence was constantly under threat.

During these times survival was assisted by constant guard against these threats.

Eventually these 'guards' became to all intents and purposes, instinctively embedded in our DNA.

Perhaps ten thousand years ago humans decided to form society.

This society developed so well that the pre historic existential threats were all but removed.

There was no longer any real danger except the bad luck of disease and asteroid strikes.

Even a bad harvest could be survived quite easily - famine was a thing of the past.

Society has yet to remove these instincts from our DNA

But that was only ten thousand years ago. Biological evolution is a slow process.

The instincts used to guard against survival threats are still running strong, like a program.

Humans, in spite of society removing all threats to survival, still instinctively NEED these instincts to be satisfied. Fully.

'Visionary rumours' are the result of this NEED for existential threat

Existential threats are created, out of nowhere, by the structures running like programs in society

They are never real threats obviously. Nonetheless, the great masse of people adopt them immediately.

Requiring no force or education, 99% of people adopt these 'visionary rumours'.

The creating social structures are government, science, media events, any respected institutions.

They come in many forms. Usually large in form.

For example:
  • climate change mania
  • pandemics which turn out to be normal disease seasons historically
  • wars where the so called enemy are just other humans who we all know are not enemies
  • famine when theres no shortage of food
  • periodic economic collapse when productivity is at an all time high
  • poverty when theres no shortage of wealth
  • the curious divide between left and right
  • the monstrous DEI and grotesque trans political agendas
... and so on in a giant collective neurosis.

The 1% who can see through the rumours waste the entire time blaming wealth and power or a cabal of evil people trying to take over the world. 

But this is a further exposition of the imaginary threat further reinforcing the neurosis at a deeper level.

Why has this proceeded without detection?

Religion since society formed has also failed to shine a light on this remarkable thing, eventually being co-opted into the 99%. Religion is the one thing which had the power to reveal the 'shadow' and has wasted it.

Society on the whole is not a conscious entity. It may have huge power to act, but it is not aware of this power nor what it has done with it already. 

Society cannot act positively to change evolution, like an individual can.

All it can do is provide enough visionary rumours as incentives to satisfy the need for survival.

Humans still have a deep instinctive NEED for existential threat. Even if survival is no longer hard, the system will create a threat out of nothing to satisfy the instinct.

The activity is buried deep inside who we are socially. It is an unconscious collective activity. It cannot be governed or controlled.

What can be done?

Why does anything need to be done? How does an individual know that an alternative to society is better?

All an individual can do is look in the mirror and discover meaning in his own way, which is free from societies visionary rumours. 

And if anything is found that can be improved, work on it.





Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...