The Curious Narrative Surrounding Dr. Craig Wright

What is a narrative and what does a narrative do?

ITs taken as pima facie that Wright is a fraud and a liar by everyone you meet, even if they have very sketchy knowledge of the topic.

All people are certain Wright is a liar and fraud without any evidence supporting it. Only social media narrative

Its curious because why do people care so much about Wright being a fraud of not. There are plenty of other infamous characters they dont give a hoot about and often support in spite of their notoriety

I've met Wright once and spoken to him many times and he is nothing like the narrative describes him. He comes across as a bit of a clever bumbler. He has always been pleasant to me only occasionally calling me a commie when I bring up IP rights and Monopoly. And especially virtuous he nearly always respnds to me online where most highly seated others simply ignore me.

Everyone says the same thing about Wright as the narrative says about him. Even people who know very little about it.

The written judgement of COPA verus Wright harmonises almost perfectly with the judgement

When I reason with an honest person about it they are staggered they've been captured by the narrative

There is no proof Wright is not Satoshi, nor that he is. Also there is no proof he forged or lied. Only a judges opinion.

Expert witnesses during the trial were often evasive when put under pressure. And several were clearly not expert in their subject matter but very silo'd in their technical experience

Comments

COPA and Dr Craig Wright's Highly Principled Autistic Journey

If you are very bored and like reading High Court written judgements, follow this link . https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/COPA-v-Wright-Judgment.pdf Warning: It is not pretty and paints the defendant in a very poor light. I'm not convinced with the ruling, largely because it follows the collective narrative so perfectly and feel the judge may well be unconsciously supporting it being unaware of the shenanigans we all know have been happening. To be fair to the judge Wright failed, deliberately or because he had no choice for some proximate reason, to show any convincing evidence. The judge knew this pre trial and was kindly giving Wright an opportunity during the trial to deliver. Wright could well be a serial forger or the unluckiest man alive. My view is that due to an important new point of law on property rights, to do with linking identity to the crypto assets, meaning that crypto assets are identical in nature to any other property in law...

Executive Summary of the Modern World

...and the imaginary rumours we still create to remind us life is all about survival We still possess primordial inherited instincts Which tell us about constant impending dangers Our ancient ancestors used them as a survival tool in an environment which was constantly dangerous And with the advent of social organisation these existential threats disappeared Yet we still possess the instinct, like it remains in our DNA. And as a substitute for real danger we create imaginary danger, to fill the gap. This survival instinct still drives us as a primary function. Because it gives our lives meaning. More meaning than religions, fame or fortune. Much more. The drive is unconscious so we cannot be aware of it's powerful driving force This means there is no scientific analysis, logic nor reason which can attend to it It's also a collective activity making it quite remote for individual action to identify and act upon So what is the result of this artificial separation of ancient inhe...

On Freedom, its Obligations and Society's Preference for Slavery

This piece is going to talk about my preference for slavery over freedom. And how and why I try to hide my preference from public view. The meaning of freedom and how self awareness fails to interact with it? I talk a lot about freedom lately and it's clear I do not understand the meaning of the term I spout so boldly. Curiously, I quickly lose my confidence when the meaning of freedom is brought under proper scrutiny. Yet I'm not self aware enough to confess to that observation of ignorance at depth. Why is it hard for me to observe my ignorance and selfishness, especially when I want to be seen by society as a good, honest, law abiding citizen? There must be a deep psychological reason which is forbidden knowledge for the politics, science and economics driving society and its so called freedoms. I cite society as being close to the root and a driving force because I constantly seek validation from it more than anything else. Even family. Freedom and obligation are mutually i...

North Stoke Life

Search This Blog