Skip to main content

Power, and the Woman

Is the world transitioning to a female form of Power?

If you could ask the state about it's radical policy over the past ten years, what would be the terms it uses to describe itself?

* Guilt
* A need to be seen as tolerant

Seems to be the mantra of the state today. Not everywhere. But it is starting to dominate public opinion on these ideas.

The spirit of the law for example is now well out of balance with the letter of the law. The law is very emotional today.

Also the apparent incentives offered by the state to legalise child abuse and rape.

Not to mention a state which prefers to treat the plight of the criminal at the cost of the citizen.

And of course, there being a systemic fracture between a near majority who want to preserve tradition, and another near majority who want to abolish it and it's history in a kind of nessecitated clean sweep.

Is the world transitioning to a female form of Power?

Where traditionally Power was seen in metaphor, myth or symbol as a male governance structure.

If so this would be a thing which only happens every several thousand years.

It's not that Power is a good or bad thing. A friend suggested it matters about who or what is wielding it. I disagreed. Power is only required when collective wisdom has been forgone. That's to say, when the people themselves as a collective have become corrupt.

A people from all corners, who in general prefer wisdom to ignorance do not need to employ Power to govern. Romans 13.

Is the world transitioning to a female form of Power?

And does this make any fundamental difference? I think not. My friend also stated about Power that "They don't understand what they are dealing with". He was not trying to say they are stupid or corrupt per se. But that God is dead, that we have killed him and we're still on the second day and he has not risen yet.

Meaning, the state in whatever form is simply unaware of it's own Power to act on the great masse. It is unconscious of itself as a proxy for the collective it represents. So Power will act with huge force in ways which nearly always causes significant net harm since it is free running and subject to natural forces. When legislation is enacted which harmonises with nature, the good will proceed. When at war with nature, the law causes bad to appear as if from out of nowhere. And we don't notice the good.

It's not an intellectual problem. But one of the collective psyche.

We can see this by looking all around. And I'd say social organisation is presently at war with nature. She will win. The price will be high. And there will be no accounting for the good and the bad. Notice I use the she word to define nature.

This also means the more Power is wielded by the state, the more social life will be in the lap of the gods, man or woman is not that relevant. 

All there is left is faith. I am not religious. But it's hard to describe modern social life in a more authentic way.


Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...