Skip to main content

Power, and the Woman

Is the world transitioning to a female form of Power?

If you could ask the state about it's radical policy over the past ten years, what would be the terms it uses to describe itself?

* Guilt
* A need to be seen as tolerant

Seems to be the mantra of the state today. Not everywhere. But it is starting to dominate public opinion on these ideas.

The spirit of the law for example is now well out of balance with the letter of the law. The law is very emotional today.

Also the apparent incentives offered by the state to legalise child abuse and rape.

Not to mention a state which prefers to treat the plight of the criminal at the cost of the citizen.

And of course, there being a systemic fracture between a near majority who want to preserve tradition, and another near majority who want to abolish it and it's history in a kind of nessecitated clean sweep.

Is the world transitioning to a female form of Power?

Where traditionally Power was seen in metaphor, myth or symbol as a male governance structure.

If so this would be a thing which only happens every several thousand years.

It's not that Power is a good or bad thing. A friend suggested it matters about who or what is wielding it. I disagreed. Power is only required when collective wisdom has been forgone. That's to say, when the people themselves as a collective have become corrupt.

A people from all corners, who in general prefer wisdom to ignorance do not need to employ Power to govern. Romans 13.

Is the world transitioning to a female form of Power?

And does this make any fundamental difference? I think not. My friend also stated about Power that "They don't understand what they are dealing with". He was not trying to say they are stupid or corrupt per se. But that God is dead, that we have killed him and we're still on the second day and he has not risen yet.

Meaning, the state in whatever form is simply unaware of it's own Power to act on the great masse. It is unconscious of itself as a proxy for the collective it represents. So Power will act with huge force in ways which nearly always causes significant net harm since it is free running and subject to natural forces. When legislation is enacted which harmonises with nature, the good will proceed. When at war with nature, the law causes bad to appear as if from out of nowhere. And we don't notice the good.

It's not an intellectual problem. But one of the collective psyche.

We can see this by looking all around. And I'd say social organisation is presently at war with nature. She will win. The price will be high. And there will be no accounting for the good and the bad. Notice I use the she word to define nature.

This also means the more Power is wielded by the state, the more social life will be in the lap of the gods, man or woman is not that relevant. 

All there is left is faith. I am not religious. But it's hard to describe modern social life in a more authentic way.


Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...