Skip to main content

A Costly Protection Tariff is Considered Better for a Nation than the Benefit of Cheaper Prices

This is the 'intelligence' both the US and the EU are using to drive both their enormous economies. 

"We know the tariff will be harmful in inflation. But we believe by protecting the home industry the net effect will be better for us" is how the experts, civil servants and bureaucrats are leading our leaders. And our leaders lack the wisdom to select out those who are lying to them.

Can you imagine a more nutty policy? Yet this is the systemic economic policy of the worlds biggest economies. 

The sad thing about the UK is that it had the opportunity to break free from both these psychotic institutions. When it voted to leave the protectionist state of the EU in 2016. Its sad because no sooner had it broken free from a systemically destructive system of tariffs, than it set up its own form of tariff with identical results. So we're still on the 'stupid pathway' as a nation.

In general, the knock on effect of the tariff is not inflation as most senior experts and influencers encourage us to believe. A tariff must always result in real and actual prices rises, which are fundamentally different. Inflation is the result of sovereign monetary policy. Price rises are the ultimate result of government stupidity interventions, blocking trade from taking place.

Deliberately blocking trade and inflationary monetary policy are both destructive. More so than doing neither. The best policy is NOT to do either in the first place. Both are harmful even if you believe another stupid political idea that 'sometimes you have to to bad to do good'. 

If you insist on the tariff, then it would be far more efficient to sink all ships containing goods your nations business and citizens want - due to being cheaper relative to what the home industry can make, as they approach port! And likewise for all ships leaving port with domestic goods that foreign nations dearly want and which would they were not at the bottom of the sea, pay for all imports.

Still stupid. But not quite as stupid.

This general policy is known as autarky. It has been practiced for several centuries most intensely by the United States of America, the Soviet Union, the European Union, pre WWII Germany and North Korea. 

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...