Skip to main content

A Costly Protection Tariff is Considered Better for a Nation than the Benefit of Cheaper Prices

This is the 'intelligence' both the US and the EU are using to drive both their enormous economies. 

"We know the tariff will be harmful in inflation. But we believe by protecting the home industry the net effect will be better for us" is how the experts, civil servants and bureaucrats are leading our leaders. And our leaders lack the wisdom to select out those who are lying to them.

Can you imagine a more nutty policy? Yet this is the systemic economic policy of the worlds biggest economies. 

The sad thing about the UK is that it had the opportunity to break free from both these psychotic institutions. When it voted to leave the protectionist state of the EU in 2016. Its sad because no sooner had it broken free from a systemically destructive system of tariffs, than it set up its own form of tariff with identical results. So we're still on the 'stupid pathway' as a nation.

In general, the knock on effect of the tariff is not inflation as most senior experts and influencers encourage us to believe. A tariff must always result in real and actual prices rises, which are fundamentally different. Inflation is the result of sovereign monetary policy. Price rises are the ultimate result of government stupidity interventions, blocking trade from taking place.

Deliberately blocking trade and inflationary monetary policy are both destructive. More so than doing neither. The best policy is NOT to do either in the first place. Both are harmful even if you believe another stupid political idea that 'sometimes you have to to bad to do good'. 

If you insist on the tariff, then it would be far more efficient to sink all ships containing goods your nations business and citizens want - due to being cheaper relative to what the home industry can make, as they approach port! And likewise for all ships leaving port with domestic goods that foreign nations dearly want and which would they were not at the bottom of the sea, pay for all imports.

Still stupid. But not quite as stupid.

This general policy is known as autarky. It has been practiced for several centuries most intensely by the United States of America, the Soviet Union, the European Union, pre WWII Germany and North Korea. 

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to Indicate Countries of the UK Are Open to Accede to the US

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious conversation to addres...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado - The 2026 Great Recession

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle always culminating in a financial crisis and great recession. The 18.6 year astronomical period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this and had been measuring it for aeons. And the politicians of the time used it to name the day when the economy had to be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because they noticed around 19 years is as long as an economy can survive when being unjustly abused by its people. Any longer making it too late to recover on its own. And without the reset much worse effects emerge. They knew this. They did not know why. They j...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...