Skip to main content

A Costly Protection Tariff is Considered Better for a Nation than the Benefit of Cheaper Prices

This is the 'intelligence' both the US and the EU are using to drive both their enormous economies. 

"We know the tariff will be harmful in inflation. But we believe by protecting the home industry the net effect will be better for us" is how the experts, civil servants and bureaucrats are leading our leaders. And our leaders lack the wisdom to select out those who are lying to them.

Can you imagine a more nutty policy? Yet this is the systemic economic policy of the worlds biggest economies. 

The sad thing about the UK is that it had the opportunity to break free from both these psychotic institutions. When it voted to leave the protectionist state of the EU in 2016. Its sad because no sooner had it broken free from a systemically destructive system of tariffs, than it set up its own form of tariff with identical results. So we're still on the 'stupid pathway' as a nation.

In general, the knock on effect of the tariff is not inflation as most senior experts and influencers encourage us to believe. A tariff must always result in real and actual prices rises, which are fundamentally different. Inflation is the result of sovereign monetary policy. Price rises are the ultimate result of government stupidity interventions, blocking trade from taking place.

Deliberately blocking trade and inflationary monetary policy are both destructive. More so than doing neither. The best policy is NOT to do either in the first place. Both are harmful even if you believe another stupid political idea that 'sometimes you have to to bad to do good'. 

If you insist on the tariff, then it would be far more efficient to sink all ships containing goods your nations business and citizens want - due to being cheaper relative to what the home industry can make, as they approach port! And likewise for all ships leaving port with domestic goods that foreign nations dearly want and which would they were not at the bottom of the sea, pay for all imports.

Still stupid. But not quite as stupid.

This general policy is known as autarky. It has been practiced for several centuries most intensely by the United States of America, the Soviet Union, the European Union, pre WWII Germany and North Korea. 

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...