Have you read the original Bitcoin white paper? It's not gospel. But the juxtaposition sends a strong signal.
Bitcoin Core, not Bitcoin proper, is very much a centralised asset contrary to urban myth - by its developers who change the protocol miners must use on a whim. So it's laughable when exerts say 'decentralised' or 'censorship resistant'. Who directs the developers is not yet clear but suspects were latently present at the recent COPA trial.
The SBR will not be able to spend most of their asset inside the wallets in their possession, during hard times. Being the seized proceeds of crime, they only have the wallets which don't always come with the keys! So it's hardly a good 'strategy' they can rely on.
Nonetheless, hacked or stolen crypto can be reassigned via a court order so long as you can provide enough quality of evidence of ownership to a judge just like any other property. By ordering miners to reassign to new addresses in a new block where the keys are known. This is our primary business but restitution takes time to process through a long civil law case.
Bitcoin Core is technically nothing more than an unregistered financial security. Some claim it's price is being pumped by stablecoins artificially. But this is no different to the nonsense that goes on in global finance already. It certainly only has exchange value. If the people decide they cannot use it in subsequent exchanges for wealth, it gives to zero overnight.
I was surprised to see some of the characters arrayed around the table with the President. He lost in 2020 largely because he trusted bad actors with power. I'm praying hard he does not make the same mistake.
There's only one Blockchain that actually works as peer to peer cash at scale using micropayments, the original design intent. But that has been shelved by big tech and the bad yet unjustified reputation of Craig Wright.
Give me a 1000 crypto experts and I will show you only one who knows how it all works.
Very much a story of 'Rome'.
Comments
Post a Comment