Skip to main content

Are Marxists, Closet Christians?

Sounds odd, but I've been listening to some credible historians recently, namely Elaine Pagels who talks well about the apocrypha.

She's saying Christianity, as an institution, has always been anti Jew. Because ~2000 years ago, Christians had to believe that Jews killed Christ, not the Romans who actually did. 

Why did they have to believe this? Because the Romans were on a rampage putting down any insurrections with brutal force at the time. Christians could not safely be seen to be blaming the Romans. As a survival strategy, they whole heartedly blamed the Jews, to survive at all.

But this mindset became normalised, so much size that, it became doctrine. 

This led to them going onto to persecuting the Jews after the Roman empire adopted Christianity, just as much as the Romans had done. And we can see it playing out over the next 1500 years or so, across western civilisation until today.

It's all there latent in Mark too. But the canon masks it well. 

I also think this fits with my experience with my Labour party Marxists friends. They really really hate Jews. It's not possible to have a rational conversation with them about it. Its hard to understand why. That Marx and Engels both hated Jews is a historic fact. I think at a stretch because even atheist Marxists are closet Christians but do not know it. They still blame the Jews for killing Christ.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...