Skip to main content

Obedience Networks and an Evolutionary Narrative


Obedience Networks are used to gain mass formation - control by authority, at scale. 

The motive of these networks is not wealth and power for the few, but for the people who form that network to be protected by that wealth and power.  

The people of the network ARE the authority, as a whole, wealth and power simply being their proxy. 

Making a great masse of people a wilful instrument of that authority - through wilful obedience.

"we are the hand, not the brain"

A network can range from small local groups to an entire nation of willing participants. 

The strongest signal of an obedience network in play, is a loud focus on principle values while never actually attending to those values at all. 

Taxation being the most effective tool used to gain the obedience

Through peer acceptance within the social hierarchy 

"I'm proud to have paid all my taxes"

And fear of exile for anyone who resists - the tax avoidance narrative

This approach is ancient, tribal, primordial, social - and used to be effective in times where small problems could kill the entire tribe. An authoritarian hierarchy was mandatory for survival in spite of its injustice.

Today it is moot, due to the staggering amount of wealth available though cooperation and technology - there is no longer a need for obedience to a hierarchical authority.

This is not to say an administration is no longer required, nor is it to say we need 'proper' communism for goodness sake. 

It is to say our tribes have yet to recreate our narratives to recognise this evolution of humanity and allow that recognition to shed the obedience networks of the aeons.

It's also to say that the staggering levels of wealth being produced now still lack justice in their distribution(more of those who create it do not get to keep it), precisely because the obedience network demands it be that way. It has nothing to do with socialism because socialists steal just as much of it unjustly as anyone else, thus reinforcing the point. 

So civilisation is truly at risk until we can make a paradigm shift in the collective psyche dominating our world. Yes, take us to Mars, please, and beyond. That is just a part of the new narrative which will help the world climb to new heights.

But while this ancient obedience network persists, with such a destructive narrative, the risk remains ultra high for this civilisation. Only the rent seeker prevails in that world

The old narrative used to be wrapped into what we today call religion and it worked well enough, and better than the alternative, though by no means perfectly. 

Do we need a new religion, with it own new narrative. Which includes everything now so obviously missing from the old narrative of Christianity. Maybe it's already underway but given we're all living right in the middle of it, we cannot see the woods for the trees

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...