Skip to main content

COPA versus Wright Written Judgement - My First Assessment of it

It is possible, that Wright is Satoshi, but has no way of proving it. And in order to mitigate his lack of evidence for his identity, he forged loads of documents and lied about a lot of stuff. I've done this in the past on occasion. As have we all. Except the Jesus's among us of course.

This mitigation strategy is of course not in the least bit ideal. But we all transgress from time to time to 'resolve' matters we know are unjust, with impunity. We believe its OK to do some bad to get the good out. All the judgement has been doing is proving, not always that well, that Wright has on the balance of probabilities, lied and forged.

Im not apologising for this if true. And I'm not saying Wright has lied and forged to the extent the judge is insisting he has. Because we all know a conspiracy is highly likely when the stakes are this high. Nor am I saying this is a conspiracy. I am saying history is a litany of conspiracy when theres a trillion dollars at stake and that one is almost certainly happening. I have no proof for it though. Just that on the balance of probabilities, a conspiracy is extant. And I'm certainly not saying the judge is involved in anything.

The written judgement does not prove Wright is **not** Satoshi and this is the burden of proof COPA were committed to by the judge at the beginning of this case by way of the 'Joint Trial'. I still can't see this being well satisfied in the written judgement, though it might well be satisfactory for the law which I respect.

Likewise, Wright similarly had to deliver a burden of proof which was enough to prove he **is** Satoshi and I think we all agree he failed to do that.

I'm only at paragraph 250 out of 945 so far. It's a very well written and organised document by Mr. Justice Mellor the judge. And I'm getting a feel for his personality and psyche which grows the more I read what he writes.

What seems to be emerging by the way the judge writes is that its possible, not probable, the judge also has been unconsciously swept up by the narrative surrounding the pseudonym Satoshi. As have so many other citizens on each side of this dualistic battle.

Let me make myself abundantly clear: I'm not in the least bit saying the judge is being 'led' in any funny business. I already have a great deal of respect for him and the way he's handled the trial with honour. From sitting there at the back of the high court observing over those several weeks. 

I am saying he is human too and being a judge does not mean you are free from the power a narrative has over the psyche than anyone else. Especially the collective one driven by a narrative.

If you need my reasoning for this, which after all is based on the balance of probabilities we all respect from the law, let me know and I'll furnish it from the written judgement, pointing out where I think the narrative is making an appearing from the shadows. 

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...