It is possible, that Wright is Satoshi, but has no way of proving it. And in order to mitigate his lack of evidence for his identity, he forged loads of documents and lied about a lot of stuff. I've done this in the past on occasion. As have we all. Except the Jesus's among us of course.
This mitigation strategy is of course not in the least bit ideal. But we all transgress from time to time to 'resolve' matters we know are unjust, with impunity. We believe its OK to do some bad to get the good out. All the judgement has been doing is proving, not always that well, that Wright has on the balance of probabilities, lied and forged.
Im not apologising for this if true. And I'm not saying Wright has lied and forged to the extent the judge is insisting he has. Because we all know a conspiracy is highly likely when the stakes are this high. Nor am I saying this is a conspiracy. I am saying history is a litany of conspiracy when theres a trillion dollars at stake and that one is almost certainly happening. I have no proof for it though. Just that on the balance of probabilities, a conspiracy is extant. And I'm certainly not saying the judge is involved in anything.
The written judgement does not prove Wright is **not** Satoshi and this is the burden of proof COPA were committed to by the judge at the beginning of this case by way of the 'Joint Trial'. I still can't see this being well satisfied in the written judgement, though it might well be satisfactory for the law which I respect.
Likewise, Wright similarly had to deliver a burden of proof which was enough to prove he **is** Satoshi and I think we all agree he failed to do that.
I'm only at paragraph 250 out of 945 so far. It's a very well written and organised document by Mr. Justice Mellor the judge. And I'm getting a feel for his personality and psyche which grows the more I read what he writes.
What seems to be emerging by the way the judge writes is that its possible, not probable, the judge also has been unconsciously swept up by the narrative surrounding the pseudonym Satoshi. As have so many other citizens on each side of this dualistic battle.
Let me make myself abundantly clear: I'm not in the least bit saying the judge is being 'led' in any funny business. I already have a great deal of respect for him and the way he's handled the trial with honour. From sitting there at the back of the high court observing over those several weeks.
I am saying he is human too and being a judge does not mean you are free from the power a narrative has over the psyche than anyone else. Especially the collective one driven by a narrative.
If you need my reasoning for this, which after all is based on the balance of probabilities we all respect from the law, let me know and I'll furnish it from the written judgement, pointing out where I think the narrative is making an appearing from the shadows.