The social world is certainly not governed by conscious activity, nor by individual free choice or freedom of speech. But absolutely by unconscious acts of the collective psyche.
Please allow me to submit more evidence of this from observed experimental results which could possibly be termed science.
Less than 3 months ago it was kind of socially unacceptable to speak about Trump or the failed assassination attempts on him in public.
Yet today at the opticians, a public facing business, they were commenting openly about it being an amazing event.
For the past ten years it's not been possible really to speak about this in public. Certainly it was impossible to do so in the work place due to the soviet style censorial leadership style pervading corporations. Unless you didn't care about your career or a pay rise.
Worse still, me pointing out these observed experimental results would have been seen as an even deeper and harmful kind of treason socially.
When I asked about this to the professional women testing my eyes, about how this kind of talk has only recently become socially permissible again, she was like , "really?", as if she'd never noticed it was ever a thing. She was genuinely unable to remember how she used to act in an entirely different way socially.
So this is not a matter that a university education, one's IQ, or success in business deals with better. Not even that you are considered widely as a smart person or natural leader. None of these things get even close to the source.
This woman is not alone. Her case is not an exception to the rule. It is the general rule. This does not mean that the woman is a good or bad person. It means that something entirely different is going on, due to the structure and movement of social organisation itself at its root, relative to what contemporary science is leading the great masse to believe in. Science is prohibiting this scientific observation from coming into the light for further scrutiny. This might be better than the alternative of revealing it scientifically, I do not know. I'm just merely pointing directly at it, in conducting an experiment.
The experiment gets more curious when you look at the time frame over which this group psychic transition occurred. It didn't happen gradually over those 3 months with people slowly forgetting how they used to believe and how they were soon to start believing differently. Just like a financial crash it happened overnight as soon as the collective unconscious recognised at once and collectively, that Mr. Trump would be acting, decisively and in a very big and different way.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not promoting Mr. Trump here at all. I'm looking at what I observe in front of my face and writing it down. I don't see Mr. T as any better or worse than any other global leader. Sure, this makes me a pariah to both sides in the group duality - I cannot be put in a box which can be targeted on one side or the other. So I'm the least trustworthy character type within social organisation. Everyone sees me as apostate. Such is the price of science!
Further still this is a collective action that happened anyway, without the need for external actors, powerful economic and political forces or teachers and gurus. It happened anyway and on its own. Of course there are many pundits and influencers who make a lot of money out of projecting blame onto these external forces as an escape route of one form or another. Such as:
- Hypnosis or what I call the Scott Adams effect - where people have somehow been hypnotised by these external forces using media institutions and propaganda
- Conditioning - where over the long term society in the form of the state has used its power to control the people, somehow i.e. the Soviet Union or other historically fascist states like that
- Programming - or what's known as a 'deep state psyop' of the James Delingpole kind, which is the most childish, yet entertaining form of this kind of projection onto the earthly world and away from confession
But these projections are a terrible intellectual mistake for those with high IQ's. These so called external actors receiving the projected blame do not have enough power to alone change billions of people overnight, even with AI. Anyone claiming so is simply helping to reinforce and intensify the very point I'm making here - there is no way a few hundred powerful people can immediately change billions. Something else, very important, yet which science refuses point blank to observe objectively, is happening.
This great masse group action - The Trump Effect, as a complete systemic event, is an internal one not external. That is, it did not happen 'on the earth'. It happened inside the collective psyche which acts like an individual and is not aware of itself. But science does not have senses to measure the psyche so it didn't happen for science. Science and its billions of followers say "this event was caused by so and so, it was them, these people need to be punished, it had nothing to do with me". And an army of 'enemy ground troops' or to whomever the shit will most easily stick, are created as images on which to project all the blame, on the earth!
The social world is certainly not governed by conscious activity, nor by individual free choice or freedom of speech. But absolutely by unconscious acts of the collective psyche.
Yes, that's right. Society as a whole, and globally is where we need to start looking for a solution. Society might even be the wrong choice. Or, society might need to be awoken from its deep unconscious sleep somehow and start acting collectively instead of like a dysfunctional and spiteful child.
That change might be called - the evolution of man, for the very first time.