Skip to main content

Grok AI is Great as a Labour Saving Device and a New Wealth Mine

I started using Grok recently to write shell scripts for my project. I'm useless at coding and do not want to learn. But need these scripts badly to make the project work. 

Roll out Grok - in just 5 minutes it wrote this script for me with just 3 branches to perfect it. All with logging and error checking - just like a wheel carried so much more load for the same amount of my effort a thousand years ago. Show me a single reasonable person who still worries about that boon!

In the past this software development work has cost me hundreds of dollars each time to hire a Developer. Not any more! 

For a link to the Grok exchange follow this

For those who worry about new inventions "taking my job", firstly, no job belongs to anyone. You are the archetypal Luddite if you go near this irrational response. Be bold and rise above that poor attitude and make hay with the new tech. If you're currently an old world Dev then move onto the higher ground and become a new world Dev. Let natural wastage kill off the old world. 

So there's no fundamental difference in innovation terms between the invention of fire, the wheel, steam etc.etc. and AI. All are fantastic labour saving devices. And that is all. To worry about it is the same as it was to worry about the invention of the wheel. 

And every fantastic invention has improved the productive power of any economy which adopts it. And the first economy to adopt it will be the first to gain in the biggest way. As will be all of the people who constitute it and exploit the new tech first. 

Are there caveats though? 

The thing is, no fantastic invention has ever improved the distribution of wealth, one iota, ever. By improving the distribution of wealth we mean - who ever creates the new wealth with their own skill and effort or own inputs of saved capital, gets to keep it. And those who contribute none of these things, do not get any of it! 

*** Please Note this below

But why have all new inventions never improved the distribution in the end? Because while land remains untaxed private property, and productivity remains taxed highly, all the gains will end up in the value of land. 

For evidence take a look here with the worlds largest economy. Look at the biggest line items, hidden away in the bottom row. Isn't it curious no one ever mentions it? I wonder why.

There's no escaping this because no wealth can be produced without exclusive access to a piece of land, anywhere in this universe, even Mars. And the best and most valuable pieces of land can produce the most quantity of wealth as an output. And its the wealth we want most, not the money we use to buy the wealth with. 

Given the natural laws of economics, the demand for these more productive pieces of land will rise, obviously. As will the annual rental value(The Rent) of this land and as a consequence its selling price.

And whomsoever owns the valuable land, when their wealth runs short, can open up a magic shaft in the ground revealing new and higher levels of wealth acquisition. 

And they can then say "This is mine!"

And so it goes...

*** Please Note this below

Please take note with extreme care here: there will be plenty of surplus for each of us to donate by voluntary choice to those who cannot access this 'free-nature' distribution for whatever reason, but that is a matter for the people, not the state. What you produce belongs to you as private property. Absolutely, and in justice. If you have empathy for those in need, then give it up right away. The justice of a nation is not made up by the law and its administration. It is made up by whatever the people make of it.


Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...
Read more

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...
Read more

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...
Read more