Skip to main content

Isn't the so-called woman's movement, yet another tool of the patriarchy?

Isn't the so-called woman's movement a tool of the patriarchy?

That is to say, women, now in Power or hoping soon to get it, are using that Power to dominate other women mostly. Let alone everybody else. 

And some women who like Power are doing it with impunity too - a 'corporate women's meet' is never scrutinised as sexism, which it absolutely is in bold daylight. The so called women's movement is a perfect exposition of abuse of women and men once it found Power.

Isn't it true that the women's movement is so angry with the trans movement because the trans movement is now eating the women's movement's lunch right under their noses? The one used to have the Power but are now forced to share the Power with the other, often having much less Power.

So yes, it's very much another tool of the patriarchy where women, with new found Power, act psychologically like men. And go on immediately to abuse that new Power, in that act.

And abuse women, just as men are supposed to have historically abused women, as a part of the overall umbrella of the patriarchy. Though this narrative about men abusing women is not in the least bit shown historically, when ALL abuse on both sides is tallied with integrity.

We've seen with astonishment how the trans movement has gained Power and now uses this so grotesquely against women and children. A key part of feminist policy is to say the trans movement is simply another extension and intensification of men abusing women - as the abuse of the Power of the patriarchy.

That's not to say that all women are part of this patriarchy or that the women that are part of it are totally patriarchs. 

It is to say, to the extent that they have grasped hold of Power, that it's the patriarchy, as Power, which is using that Power to harm women and men all within the safe confines of social organisation and the law.

The curious thing about men abusing women in whatever form this so called patriarchy comes, is that no one is permitted to talk about the huge level of abuse of men by women, largely through reputation destruction. 

Power, always corrupts, even when those who hold it speak nicely and feign empathy.

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...