Skip to main content

Isn't the so-called woman's movement, yet another tool of the patriarchy?

Isn't the so-called woman's movement a tool of the patriarchy?

That is to say, women, now in Power or hoping soon to get it, are using that Power to dominate other women mostly. Let alone everybody else. 

And some women who like Power are doing it with impunity too - a 'corporate women's meet' is never scrutinised as sexism, which it absolutely is in bold daylight. The so called women's movement is a perfect exposition of abuse of women and men once it found Power.

Isn't it true that the women's movement is so angry with the trans movement because the trans movement is now eating the women's movement's lunch right under their noses? The one used to have the Power but are now forced to share the Power with the other, often having much less Power.

So yes, it's very much another tool of the patriarchy where women, with new found Power, act psychologically like men. And go on immediately to abuse that new Power, in that act.

And abuse women, just as men are supposed to have historically abused women, as a part of the overall umbrella of the patriarchy. Though this narrative about men abusing women is not in the least bit shown historically, when ALL abuse on both sides is tallied with integrity.

We've seen with astonishment how the trans movement has gained Power and now uses this so grotesquely against women and children. A key part of feminist policy is to say the trans movement is simply another extension and intensification of men abusing women - as the abuse of the Power of the patriarchy.

That's not to say that all women are part of this patriarchy or that the women that are part of it are totally patriarchs. 

It is to say, to the extent that they have grasped hold of Power, that it's the patriarchy, as Power, which is using that Power to harm women and men all within the safe confines of social organisation and the law.

The curious thing about men abusing women in whatever form this so called patriarchy comes, is that no one is permitted to talk about the huge level of abuse of men by women, largely through reputation destruction. 

Power, always corrupts, even when those who hold it speak nicely and feign empathy.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...