Skip to main content

The Jealousy of Wealth Pathology

The Tax Collectors Network hates LVT because its adoption means it can't blame the rich anymore.

Further...

Georgists hate Location Value Covenants(LVC) because it means they too would no longer be able to blame the wealthy and the rich.

These planet saving institutions see wealth and power as the usual suspects; capitalists and bankers etc etc. This is also a derivative pathology - homeowners own the most economic value as a class in the world today, by a long way. So this deception is used to divert attention away from the root perpetrator - homeowners.

So the distribution of economic value is slowly over the millennia being spread more thinly to a wider beneficiary. From King, to baron, to mercantilist, to Kulak, to the democratic voter today. 

Now "we are all in it together". 

Nearly all. Economic value is now very widely and thinly distributed. Yet, the beneficiary has earned none of it so the 'better' distribution has created an even more staggeringly unjust distribution. Mostly through the mortgage. Sure, bankers are merely the drug dealers. Who is guilty, the dealer or the addict?

Can you see how this 'jealousy of wealth' pathology descends slowly into the depths of a systemic psychopathy? Where the jealousy ends are used to justify the hateful means.

And so it goes.

This analysis of the collectives psychopathy is really where an authentic activists energy should be spent. On understanding why none of us, no matter what ideology, do not really care about anyone.

That is, why do all the planet saving and bitterly jealous ideologies become all encompassing and dominant in leading our thoughts and actions. 

Thereby, conveniently blocking any progress?

Communism, socialism, planet saving etc all work well, in theory. As do anarchism and Georgism. But they are all just theory.

When will we start an authentic dialogue? Finally.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...