Skip to main content

Everything is a Gang - Leadership are Gangsters


Everything is a gang. This means all leadership. In any scenario. Government, corporate, NGO, charity. 

There are no exceptions to this rule. 

Even the state, democracy or tyranny matters little, is simply the biggest and most powerful gang, in that time and place.

We've simply become used to it - it is normalised. And we've entrapped ourselves through a hierarchy of obedience. We obey so well because the rewards are social acceptance and a higher seat in the tribe. 

Again, there are no exceptions among all people here either - everyone obeys, no matter what their principles are. Principles are a phoney smoke screen we all use. So its mental health to wave hands around calling out hypocrisy.

Any one of the hierarchies could be overthrown overnight if the insurrectionists had a bigger 'army of support'. Theres no need to await the end of an election cycle or weakness in the tyrant.

It does not not have to be a violent handover of POWER - e.g. a large enough group of people resisting by legally avoiding as much tax as possible would bring any government down quickly. 

Among many other forms of uncivil obedience, follow the rules exactly- do not exceed your remit, to place that gang and its leadership in a no win scenario. Whatever can be used legally to cause the tax base to fall precipitously and clog the courts.

Beware: remember The Red Terror in proto Soviet Union - to quash the insurrection, the new tyranny deliberately killed 50 million of its own people, mostly innocents. Talk about genocide. Curiously a lot of voters are calling for another one today, for identical reasons using the same excuses - mental health, at scale. 

Guess what? All that would deliver is a new gang. 

There is a remedy though. Everyone knows by intuition what that is. 

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...