Skip to main content

The Propaganda I Used to Use When Highly Active Politically

This graph is broadly true statistically and can quickly be verified on Grok AI - 

  1. Income from work and business is heavily taxed to fund the state and welfare, killing many businesses and jobs; this is the main driver of bankruptcy, unemployment and low wages (open borders worsen it but are secondary).
  2. Property ownership faces little tax on rents or capital gains, so everyone—rich or poor—rushes to buy housing first. This diverts huge sums of money from productive investments into unproductive real estate.

Caveat: By showing you this I'm not saying it is right or wrong, that something should be done about it or that we should be encouraged to do more of it. I am just showing it to you for your observation.

So what's the issue?
The issue is that it's forbidden knowledge - socially, in any circle politically, it is forbidden for any obedient citizen to shine a light on these observed facts. Under threat of 'exile' from that social circle.

This pathology is the only thing which everyone across the political spectrum agrees on censoring for the same reason. Everyone stands in harmony against the revelation. For an analytical psychologist this unity is a strong signal the collective is resisting something important. 

During a campaign I used the graph as propaganda because the light it shines is very bright indeed. It was interesting to note that most people would be hypnotised when they first saw it, appearing to love what they were seeing yet hoping no one would notice their 'joy'. And when questioned would refuse point blank to go into it. Not necessarily because it looked hypocritical, but because it would be a clear signal they were starting to disobey the tribe. I used this experiment a thousand times over the years and never once got a confession - an even stronger signal something important was happening.

What I'd not considered at the time were the reasons why this might be and the consequences of an unlikely collective revelation of it: 

  • The reason why everyone knows automatically not to discuss it is that everyone one of us has snout buried deep already or aspires to it one day if poor - it has nothing to do with corrupt wealth and power - the people *are* power and the allegation is just a collective projection.
  • The consequences of a revelation cannot really be forecast accurately because who can say what will happen if such a deep and wide spread collective change occurs suddenly - often it would be a great recession to correct recent sin. All you can really say is it will be either a really amazing evolution of humanity as Mr Musk is hoping for. Or a really devastating regression and this is probably why nature nearly always blocks it from taking place.
I was quite naive back then. 

By showing you this I'm not saying it is right or wrong, that something should be done about it or that we should be encouraged to do more of it. I am just showing it to you for your observation.

I do have 2 very well founded and understood policy proposals which might deliver a remedy. I'm keeping those to myself until I know an authentic dialogue has a chance of taking place. But you can find them littered all over this blog if you're genuinely ready for that.

Labels:

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...
Read more

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...
Read more

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...
Read more