Skip to main content

What Are the Ultimate Effects of Labour Savings Devices Like AI?


The ultimate effect of a successful labour saving device, such as AI, is to increase rent - the value of locations. 

It's also to save capital. Capital being a derivative of labour.

There are other superficial effects in between. For example:

  1. incentivises people/business to buy locations where the device produces the most economic wealth
  2. thus increasing the demand for these valuable locations
  3. which, given locations are fixed in supply, means the price of it must go up
You will hear people respond to this by saying "but this is a superficial effect" too. But what else is bigger than the value of locations? And there is no wealth in this universe that can be created without secure and exclusive access to a location, none. 

So what could be more important economically and politically than the location value of farmland, a city, a nation, or a new planet?
I'm not saying this is right or wrong, that something must be done about it or that we should encourage everyone to do more of it. I'm simply pointing at it happening. 

Neither am I saying that about labour savings devices like AI. I am saying "What shall we do?"

Beware though: this is forbidden knowledge: mention it among your peer group and they will see you sent into virtual exile with far more ferocity than being anti vax, pro digital ID or Islamophobic. 

Now we can see how this dissonance and blind obedience is rather a big problem for the world - every single person born on this planet and the next, has snout buried deep in the trough - eat your heart out wealth and power!

If it's true it means that if you own the land, you will receive the increasing rents, for free, tax free, having done no work, nor invested any savings into the earnings. And governments of all party's will bail you out first during the next recession. 

So, can you now see why this is forbidden knowledge? "My precious"

For any leadership reading this, understanding it and wanting to bring it into the light, the first thing you must do is figure out:
The last thing you need to work out is a policy to deal with it immediately. You must see it from the mind of the unconscious collective - how the great masse of people see it. 


Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...