![]() |
There is a majority of selfish and ignorant people in all nations, nearly all of whom have the vote.
So the biggest effect democracy has had, largely on the West, is that it has given selfish and ignorant people the chance to decide who leads.
Now, what kind of leader do you think an ignorant and selfish person would choose?
It will be an ignorant and selfish kind will it not?
What is the biggest benefit of this for the people?
The voters now have a way to escape from their own complicity in the selfishness and ignorance - they can blame the very leaders they keep electing.
Throw it all onto the state. And walk away, scott free. Blame free. Obligation free. Duty free!
My view is that the vote should only be granted to people who have shown they are worthy.
I do not know how to define worthy yet. Suffice to say if we have leaders who are still ignorant and selfish, then we need to redefine 'worthy' and keep on doing so until we find the answer.
The trouble is there is a vast majority of people in the world like the commentator above. So how on earth will this program get off the ground?
Look inside for the answer and stop projecting blame onto the world for your own sins.
