We are all playing a game which in public we refuse to admit we're playing.
We all know the rules and fully accept them in the game.
The rules are to scam your neighbours to get on in the world. And we all carry it out willingly by any means and at scale, i.e.
nationwide activity by all, all people are partaking in it, politically there is no difference between the winners and losers and how they play the game
In the end, some households win and some lose.
For the winners the true reason for their win was that they were better players in the scam - effectively they took the rules and used them to deliver 'success'. For the losers that they were worse players.
The winners totally accept all of this. The losers are totally unable to accept any of this.
Everyone took part willingly, knew the rules and were totally aware of the consequences of winning and losing, a priori. For an outside observer such as an alien, there is no escaping this observation.
The winners believe it was because they worked harder and deserve it more than the losers. The losers believe it was because the winners had robbed them and must be punished.
Is there any evidence supporting this wild allegation against the entire population if the world? there always is plenty. The losers always 'project' themselves onto the winners. Punishment is always the sentence. For example a 100% land value tax AND abolition of all other taxes, would solve most of the worlds problems immediately. Yet if adopted, the winners would no longer be punishable, by implication. Punishment is the motive. Not justice.
The game recommences with a new iteration after each transfer of wealth has completed(about every 20 years). Almost never are the old winners the new winners. And frequently the old losers are the new winners.
And in the minds of the entire population of the world, never the twain shall meet.
And so it goes...
.jpg)