Skip to main content

Nuclear War is By No Means the End


Looks closely and see about 6 miles away is Didcot Power station, likely to receive a direct hit if a full scale nuclear exchange where ever to take place.

I'm standing atop the Chilterns at Nuffield. At this distance I would be largely safe if I shielded myself from the initial few seconds of intense light, say behind a car. I would certainly feel the shock wave which would hit about 20+ seconds later travelling at the speed of sound, but could stand against it if I braced myself. 

If the burst were made to hit the ground, which would create a lot of fallout and be an unusual military tactic, I'm at 90 degrees to the typically prevailing wind direction which would take the danger toward the right in this photo. If the wind were travelling in my direction, I'd either need to vacate the area quickly and in the fastest way (calculate the best direction to drive fastest from the cloud, much like the Enola Gay, but for her just to escape the blast, probably about 8 o'clock from ground zero) 

If I could not escape the fallout cloud in time for some reason I could have prepared in the build up to the attack by building a simple fall out shelter to survive, shielded from the gamma rays by 3 feet of simple earth and with a dog legged entrance so that no gammas could shine inside. After say 3 weeks enough of the settled fallout would have decayed away for my cells to permanently tolerate the remainder. Obviously take more care with the young and pregnant before going back outside.

The standard yield for best destructive effect for a nuclear weapon is 100 kilo tonnes. This would be detonated just high enough for the fireball to not quite touch the ground(about the height of the cloud base here) causing a 'mach stem' shock wave across the plain - this effect intensifies the shock by reflecting the blast wave thats already hit the ground onto the direct shock wave. Thus destroying by the total blast as much as possible in its wake. 

But I expect the bomb wont be detonated too low that large amounts of fallout are created and sucked up into the lower atmosphere. If it was it would spread downwind, north-east in the UK and then slowly fall to the ground over maybe a narrow 50 mile cone. A 100kt bombs best detonation height is likely to raise the fallout cloud so high into the stratosphere that the dangerous effects of fallout will be rendered largely infinitesimal, most of it maybe never making it to the ground at dangerous dose levels. 

Then it would be a matter of using wisdom followed by intelligence to find food and water and to start the inevitable recovery with other sensible people. It all goes in cycles.

Knowledge, is Power.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...