Skip to main content

If You Can See It, You can See it

If you see it, you see it. If you do not see it, you do not see it. There is no in between. There is no learning process. It cannot be taught nor earned. Time cannot help you learn.

This is a short piece to show how knowledge of things which are important to us psychologically can be seen immediately by intuition. And cannot be taught by a guru or teacher who will only make things harder to understand.

That is to say...
  • if you use time to understand
  • if you try to learn about it
...you will not make it through. Because these two things only serve to help you escape. Time gives you 'the time' to escape, an opportunity to avoid looking directly at what's in front of your face. Learning gives you a story and an excuse to justify and cover up the escape.

If you know about anything important, we all do, it will have happened to you in an instant - call this a singularity. You cannot learn about it and time will only help you to escape from knowing. Don't ask me how to get it, I do not know. It just happens. And do not expect that once you have seen it, it will stay with you - its not like a test to enter a new country as one of its citizens. 

All I can say about it is its available to every child born, no one is exempt, no matter where you come from, the law, empathy and morals are irrelevant to it, you must be deadly serious about observation, and not afraid about an inevitable change of mind and likely your worldview. Most of all you must be willing to suspend all prior beliefs while you observe.

Tough right? But do you really want to know?

Obviously this is heresy in our modern secular world, where very little knowledge is extant and when a person sees it in an instant has been taught to ignore it. Sure, we turned away from what religious people call God. No wonder we cannot see. Are blind. And need raising from the dead.

This is my response to a good friend who was suggesting I listen to one of the few remaining politicians with an intellect. (I'm not suggesting that an intellect is a virtue at all - it is another form of escape). My friend was pointing out how this intellectual politician was using his intellect to escape from an injustice which his tribe is proud of. But is probably not aware of it. All he knows for certain is that he must SIGNAL to his tribe, how to escape, by utilising his intellect.

"I'm not a big fan any more of the intellectual politicians. As I suspect you are not either. The thing is, once again, they MUST signal obedience, to their own tribe, as a first duty to the tribe. They only hold a high seat because they are the best at doing this signalling. Their tribe put them there for this very task - to signal obedience in the most perfect way available. And the intellect is used to make their signals most effective more than it is used for all else. The intellect is barely used at all to determine proper cause and effect of the great social problems of the world. That is only a nice to have. And anyway, given signalling dominates all activity, cause and effect are very much likely to 'interfere' with the signal, so cause and effect are heavily discounted further still. And this is why you can never 'break through' with economic justice - the tribe simply does not want that - the tribe and its narrative are everything and impenetrable.

Once again, if you cannot see this immediately, do not try to understand by using time to learn and think about it. You will see it immediately by intuition, if you commit yourself to observing what is happening in front of your face. Or you will see nothing. Do you have the strength to mask out all the judgement as you observe something though? The media, social media, your beliefs etc...

If you do not see it, you do not see it. There is no in between. If you see it, you see it. Jesus talks all the time about this I think."

I'm not religious by the way. And what he was supposed to have said makes perfect sense.
Labels:

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to Indicate Countries of the UK Are Open to Accede to the US

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious conversation to addres...
Read more

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...
Read more

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...
Read more