Skip to main content

If You Can See It, You can See it

If you see it, you see it. If you do not see it, you do not see it. There is no in between. There is no learning process. It cannot be taught nor earned. Time cannot help you learn.

This is a short piece to show how knowledge of things which are important to us psychologically can be seen immediately by intuition. And cannot be taught by a guru or teacher who will only make things harder to understand.

That is to say...
  • if you use time to understand
  • if you try to learn about it
...you will not make it through. Because these two things only serve to help you escape. Time gives you 'the time' to escape, an opportunity to avoid looking directly at what's in front of your face. Learning gives you a story and an excuse to justify and cover up the escape.

If you know about anything important, we all do, it will have happened to you in an instant - call this a singularity. You cannot learn about it and time will only help you to escape from knowing. Don't ask me how to get it, I do not know. It just happens. And do not expect that once you have seen it, it will stay with you - its not like a test to enter a new country as one of its citizens. 

All I can say about it is its available to every child born, no one is exempt, no matter where you come from, the law, empathy and morals are irrelevant to it, you must be deadly serious about observation, and not afraid about an inevitable change of mind and likely your worldview. Most of all you must be willing to suspend all prior beliefs while you observe.

Tough right? But do you really want to know?

Obviously this is heresy in our modern secular world, where very little knowledge is extant and when a person sees it in an instant has been taught to ignore it. Sure, we turned away from what religious people call God. No wonder we cannot see. Are blind. And need raising from the dead.

This is my response to a good friend who was suggesting I listen to one of the few remaining politicians with an intellect. (I'm not suggesting that an intellect is a virtue at all - it is another form of escape). My friend was pointing out how this intellectual politician was using his intellect to escape from an injustice which his tribe is proud of. But is probably not aware of it. All he knows for certain is that he must SIGNAL to his tribe, how to escape, by utilising his intellect.

"I'm not a big fan any more of the intellectual politicians. As I suspect you are not either. The thing is, once again, they MUST signal obedience, to their own tribe, as a first duty to the tribe. They only hold a high seat because they are the best at doing this signalling. Their tribe put them there for this very task - to signal obedience in the most perfect way available. And the intellect is used to make their signals most effective more than it is used for all else. The intellect is barely used at all to determine proper cause and effect of the great social problems of the world. That is only a nice to have. And anyway, given signalling dominates all activity, cause and effect are very much likely to 'interfere' with the signal, so cause and effect are heavily discounted further still. And this is why you can never 'break through' with economic justice - the tribe simply does not want that - the tribe and its narrative are everything and impenetrable.

Once again, if you cannot see this immediately, do not try to understand by using time to learn and think about it. You will see it immediately by intuition, if you commit yourself to observing what is happening in front of your face. Or you will see nothing. Do you have the strength to mask out all the judgement as you observe something though? The media, social media, your beliefs etc...

If you do not see it, you do not see it. There is no in between. If you see it, you see it. Jesus talks all the time about this I think."

I'm not religious by the way. And what he was supposed to have said makes perfect sense.

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...