Skip to main content

What is God

Usual stuff here. No one knows. This is my view.

Beliefs - we all have them. When I want to know about something, I create an image that sounds right about that thing and then analyse the image I just created to see what it tells me about what I want to know.

This is otherwise known as a 'belief system'.

There is nothing wrong with beliefs in themselves. What I make of them is extremely important though. But only to me. If my beliefs work for me I will become more whole. If they do not, less. There is nothing inherently good in beliefs, they are neither good nor bad things. My beliefs are only as good as what I make of them. 

Can you spot the potential problem with beliefs?

I create an image. And then I analyse the image, not the thing I want to know about. I'm no longer looking at the thing, but an image of it. 

And because the image is a cosy place for me to rest my head, I adopt it quite easily, and from then on imagine this image IS the thing. And never look back.

From now on, when I say "but I have truth" or "follow the science" or "these are just the facts", this is an unconscious activity, saying 'This is the image I created about this thing and I like it so much, I have made it real. This image has now become, my world. I believe. If you object, you are offending me in the biggest way possible and you are a danger to the world I created which gives me so much meaning'.

From this point on I am unable to distinguish between the thing yet to be analysed and the image I created of it. I have rendered this activity into the unconscious. 

There are no teachers in this game. Beliefs can be from the individual or the collective. If the collective creates an image of something, it becomes what is called a narrative, a story about reality but not reality itself. It is these kind of images which are so powerful within social organisation - with the power to create or destroy us, depending on what we as a great mass of people make of them. When I adopt a collective belief, I am simply believing in what someone else believes in. What someone else has told me to believe. An image of something which I have allowed someone to convince me is the real thing. This activity was totally my free choice to accept. I was not manipulated into it. What I believe in and what is real are both matters entirely for me to take care of. I cannot go to the judge of all and say "but they told me it was true". There are no teachers in this game. 

So when I find religion and start to believe in God, I create an image of God because I cannot really know about it. And then I start to worship the image I created, never looking back to its source. Part of the image creation was that it would always be immutable. Let us pray this image makes me more whole, because then I will be able to love. Finally.

Nevertheless,  I am now worshiping an image, not God. An image of God. I believe that from now on and there's no going back.

A wise old man came up to me once. I asked him "if you are so clever tell me what God is". He said:

"when you have found the strength to suspend all your beliefs, so that you are no longer looking at images, there you will find God"

Split the wood; I am there. Lift the stone and you will find me there.


Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...