Skip to main content

What is God

Usual stuff here. No one knows. This is my view.

Beliefs - we all have them. When I want to know about something, I create an image that sounds right about that thing and then analyse the image I just created to see what it tells me about what I want to know.

This is otherwise known as a 'belief system'.

There is nothing wrong with beliefs in themselves. What I make of them is extremely important though. But only to me. If my beliefs work for me I will become more whole. If they do not, less. There is nothing inherently good in beliefs, they are neither good nor bad things. My beliefs are only as good as what I make of them. 

Can you spot the potential problem with beliefs?

I create an image. And then I analyse the image, not the thing I want to know about. I'm no longer looking at the thing, but an image of it. 

And because the image is a cosy place for me to rest my head, I adopt it quite easily, and from then on imagine this image IS the thing. And never look back.

From now on, when I say "but I have truth" or "follow the science" or "these are just the facts", this is an unconscious activity, saying 'This is the image I created about this thing and I like it so much, I have made it real. This image has now become, my world. I believe. If you object, you are offending me in the biggest way possible and you are a danger to the world I created which gives me so much meaning'.

From this point on I am unable to distinguish between the thing yet to be analysed and the image I created of it. I have rendered this activity into the unconscious. 

There are no teachers in this game. Beliefs can be from the individual or the collective. If the collective creates an image of something, it becomes what is called a narrative, a story about reality but not reality itself. It is these kind of images which are so powerful within social organisation - with the power to create or destroy us, depending on what we as a great mass of people make of them. When I adopt a collective belief, I am simply believing in what someone else believes in. What someone else has told me to believe. An image of something which I have allowed someone to convince me is the real thing. This activity was totally my free choice to accept. I was not manipulated into it. What I believe in and what is real are both matters entirely for me to take care of. I cannot go to the judge of all and say "but they told me it was true". There are no teachers in this game. 

So when I find religion and start to believe in God, I create an image of God because I cannot really know about it. And then I start to worship the image I created, never looking back to its source. Part of the image creation was that it would always be immutable. Let us pray this image makes me more whole, because then I will be able to love. Finally.

Nevertheless,  I am now worshiping an image, not God. An image of God. I believe that from now on and there's no going back.

A wise old man came up to me once. I asked him "if you are so clever tell me what God is". He said:

"when you have found the strength to suspend all your beliefs, so that you are no longer looking at images, there you will find God"

Split the wood; I am there. Lift the stone and you will find me there.


Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...