Skip to main content

Being a Legend in Your Own Lunchtime

I'm going to talk about what I call 'celebrity events'. 

As a highly active political campaigner, on occasion I would get temporarily famous through TV, Radio or newspaper interviews etc. I called this a 'celebrity event'. A short period of time where ones name is projected into the limelight.

The best political leaders and actual celebrities, somehow manage to maintain these events for extended periods of time, to the extent it becomes a permanent position. I never managed to possess that kind of talent. 

Nevertheless, it happened to me on the odd lucky occasion and was always a huge ego trip. Until I realised what was happening to me as each celebrity event played out. This game requires very high energy to remain active and mentally healthy. These ego trips contributed significantly to maintaining the necessary energy, given it was not a natural talent.

Following each event, the biggest surprise was that other celebrities and political leaders in this large network would suddenly start speaking to me, while prior to that they would ignore me totally. Trust me, I spent huge energy trying to get a response from them during campaign work. 

For some reason, once a light was being shone on my ego, it attracted other 'successful' ego's too. Like flies around honey. Particularly if it was topical politically. The biggest example of such an event was the Occupy protests where I became a 'light' for expertise on political economy on camp. Several more came about from standing twice as a candidate for a parliamentary seat in UK general elections.

The feeling I got from this network of more highly seated celebrities, activists and politicians was one of 'wanting a piece of me'. Almost literally. Suddenly famous people would invite me to lunch and pay for it all. Suddenly I was on the front page of a national newspaper. Or the centre spread of the nations top Sunday paper. People came flocking. Whereas before I would be treated without neither honour nor respect.

I had not worked harder or created some fantastically innovative piece on how to save the world, for it. Something in the ether had projected my ego into the limelight. I never discovered if this something might have been Power. It was not a controlled activity. The closest I can say I got to figuring out the source of this sudden praise, was that the collective of people had decided it, unconsciously. There was no election or conscious decision making process by the great masse.

Here's how the thing got even more mysterious. As soon as I stopped getting the high press coverge, the same people disappeared in a flash. Not a nice and graceful way where 'friends' I'd made during the life of the event would remain. I cannot think of a single acquaintance made during a celebrity event who wanted to remain friends once that mysterious power had subsided.

There had been no falling out with anyone, which prior to a celebrity event were commonplace so I can see that exactly. All there had been had been an 'event' where suddenly I was 'wanted'.

So the collective is easily satisfied and has a short attention span. So short thats its not really aware of its own activity.

What is the meaning of all this? 

People, whoever they are, no matter how much they profess to be saving the world, only ever pay respect to the celebrity of wealth and power.

Just like everyone else.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

COPA and Dr Craig Wright's Highly Principled Autistic Journey

If you are very bored and like reading High Court written judgements, follow this link .  https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/COPA-v-Wright-Judgment.pdf  Warning: It is not pretty and paints the defendant in a very poor light. I'm not convinced with the ruling, largely because it follows the collective narrative so perfectly and feel the judge may well be unconsciously supporting it being unaware of the shenanigans we all know have been happening.  To be fair to the judge Wright failed, deliberately or because he had no choice for some proximate reason, to show any convincing evidence. The judge knew this pre trial and was kindly giving Wright an opportunity during the trial to deliver.  Wright could well be a serial forger or the unluckiest man alive. My view is that due to an important new point of law on property rights, to do with linking identity to the crypto assets, meaning that crypto assets are identical in nature to any other property in law...

Executive Summary of the Modern World

...and the imaginary rumours we still create to remind us life is all about survival  We still possess primordial inherited instincts Which tell us about constant impending dangers Our ancient ancestors used them as a survival tool in an environment which was constantly dangerous And with the advent of social organisation these existential threats disappeared Yet we still possess the instinct, like it remains in our DNA. And as a substitute for real danger we create imaginary danger, to fill the gap. This survival instinct still drives us as a primary function. Because it gives our lives meaning. More meaning than religions, fame or fortune. Much more. The drive is unconscious so we cannot be aware of it's powerful driving force This means there is no scientific analysis, logic nor reason which can attend to it It's also a collective activity making it quite remote for individual action to identify and act upon So what is the result of this artificial separation of ancient inhe...

On Freedom, its Obligations and Society's Preference for Slavery

This piece is going to talk about my preference for slavery over freedom. And how and why I try to hide my preference from public view. The meaning of freedom and how self awareness fails to interact with it? I talk a lot about freedom lately and it's clear I do not understand the meaning of the term I spout so boldly. Curiously, I quickly lose my confidence when the meaning of freedom is brought under proper scrutiny. Yet I'm not self aware enough to confess to that observation of ignorance at depth. Why is it hard for me to observe my ignorance and selfishness, especially when I want to be seen by society as a good, honest, law abiding citizen? There must be a deep psychological reason which is forbidden knowledge for the politics, science and economics driving society and its so called freedoms. I cite society as being close to the root and a driving force because I constantly seek validation from it more than anything else. Even family. Freedom and obligation are mutually i...