Skip to main content

Does the Acquittal of Tommy Robinson Today Show the People Have Also Been Systemically Undermined?

While listening to the evidence 3 weeks ago, it was clear the police who arrested him, had tacitly been given 'permission' to attack Mr. Robinson. If so, that could only have happened if the authority behind it supported it of course. 

And who exactly is this authority? It is certainly not wealth and power. 

This 'permission' is not incitement in the legal sense. It is the state attacking selected constituencies of its own people. Which is more sinister of course - because then the group of people with protected characteristics are not protected from it, in law. And the group who are protected are fully complicit by implication. 

The law does not attend to this yet. And never has historically. Because you cannot condemn a large group of people. You need a 'legal person'.

So it's a significant mistake to believe its the media acting on behalf of the government as Mr. Robinson says (though I fully understand it politic)

At a deeper level its the media acting on behalf of one of 2 large constituencies:
  1. those who obey the narrative and
  2. those who do not
Blaming wealth and power in any way, only serves authority with more obedience(control at scale) because it deflects from root cause - helping the people to escape obvious complicity.

Think: this is not about wealth and power. It is about a battle between the commanding narrative of each group and the wilful obedience to each narrative by the people of the group.

This isn't to say 'a legal person' is complicit. It is to say the collective of people which that narrative commands, is. The group as a whole is fully responsible - the tribe.  

If you look at it this way, a lot more becomes clear as to how to proceed.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...
Read more

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...
Read more

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...
Read more