Skip to main content

How Big Does a Conspiracy Have to Be Before the Seditious are The Democratic Majority?


This post is going to tell you about the conspiracy logical fallacy.

There is no cabal of wealth and power, no WEF, no globalist agenda, no freemasons directing the fate of the world. Or at least these networks do not have enough power to overwhelm the people. 

It is the great masse of people who are fully behind a conspiracy. And whichever collective of people has the most power to do so is the one who prevails. 

So it always ends with something close to the democratic majority supporting the crime. Or a large enough collective of people to overturn justice. 

Because how can a few powerful people overwhelm 8 billion people? Are you stupid or have you allowed yourself to be hypnotised, nudged, manipulated, coerced. All these things YOU allowed to happen. 

Sure, a few hundred thousand people - such as we've seen with the pandemic and pharmaceuticals might be a small fraction of a nation. But is that not enough! It certainly is not a cabal of wealth and power. It is a very large group of people. this is also why proportional representation can only guarantee corruption and justice will take place - all in the name of the people.

Democracy is not enough to cope with this with one man one vote. It's not that democracy is a good or a bad thing. It is that it's not a satisfactory way to distribute power, that we should confess to this as individual people and then get a conversation going on what can be done about it. 

Everybody lies. Everything is a conspiracy. And there's one giant conspiracy, in which all people are involved in a sedition against everyone else. This is not a counsel of despair. It is observing it happening.  

Presently, once the people have chosen to become corrupt, the worst will eventually rise to the top. It's no use blaming Power for it. That would be a spoilt child's response.

"The psyche is a self-regulating system… What is repressed returns as fate. Envy is fate knocking" CG Jung on 'jealousy of wealth'

"Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate." CG Jung on 'obedience'


Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...