This post is going to tell you about the conspiracy logical fallacy.
There is no cabal of wealth and power, no WEF, no globalist agenda, no freemasons directing the fate of the world. Or at least these networks do not have enough power to overwhelm the people.
It is the great masse of people who are fully behind a conspiracy. And whichever collective of people has the most power to do so is the one who prevails.
So it always ends with something close to the democratic majority supporting the crime. Or a large enough collective of people to overturn justice.
Because how can a few powerful people overwhelm 8 billion people? Are you stupid or have you allowed yourself to be hypnotised, nudged, manipulated, coerced. All these things YOU allowed to happen.
Sure, a few hundred thousand people - such as we've seen with the pandemic and pharmaceuticals might be a small fraction of a nation. But is that not enough! It certainly is not a cabal of wealth and power. It is a very large group of people. this is also why proportional representation can only guarantee corruption and justice will take place - all in the name of the people.
Democracy is not enough to cope with this with one man one vote. It's not that democracy is a good or a bad thing. It is that it's not a satisfactory way to distribute power, that we should confess to this as individual people and then get a conversation going on what can be done about it.
Everybody lies. Everything is a conspiracy. And there's one giant conspiracy, in which all people are involved in a sedition against everyone else. This is not a counsel of despair. It is observing it happening.
Presently, once the people have chosen to become corrupt, the worst will eventually rise to the top. It's no use blaming Power for it. That would be a spoilt child's response.
"The psyche is a self-regulating system… What is repressed returns as fate. Envy is fate knocking" CG Jung on 'jealousy of wealth'
"Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate." CG Jung on 'obedience'