Skip to main content

How Big Does a Conspiracy Have to Be Before the Seditious are The Democratic Majority?

This post is going to tell you about the conspiracy logical fallacy.

There is no cabal of wealth and power, no WEF, no globalist agenda, no freemasons directing the fate of the world. Or at least these networks do not have enough power to overwhelm the people. 

It is the great masse of people who are fully behind a conspiracy. And whichever collective of people has the most power to do so is the one who prevails. 

So it always ends with something close to the democratic majority supporting the crime. Or a large enough collective of people to overturn justice. 

Because how can a few powerful people overwhelm 8 billion people? Are you stupid or have you allowed yourself to be hypnotised, nudged, manipulated, coerced. All these things YOU allowed to happen. 

Sure, a few hundred thousand people - such as we've seen with the pandemic and pharmaceuticals might be a small fraction of a nation. But is that not enough! It certainly is not a cabal of wealth and power. It is a very large group of people. this is also why proportional representation can only guarantee corruption and justice will take place - all in the name of the people.

Democracy is not enough to cope with this with one man one vote. It's not that democracy is a good or a bad thing. It is that it's not a satisfactory way to distribute power, that we should confess to this as individual people and then get a conversation going on what can be done about it. 

Everybody lies. Everything is a conspiracy. And there's one giant conspiracy, in which all people are involved in a sedition against everyone else. This is not a counsel of despair. It is observing it happening.  

Presently, once the people have chosen to become corrupt, the worst will eventually rise to the top. It's no use blaming Power for it. That would be a spoilt child's response.

"The psyche is a self-regulating system… What is repressed returns as fate. Envy is fate knocking" CG Jung on 'jealousy of wealth'

"Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate." CG Jung on 'obedience'


Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...