Skip to main content

Embrace the Gold & Confess the Shadow

Power, and Property Rights

Ultimately Power is the only real goal for all of us. Property inevitably is the reward. I'm not saying this is a good thing or a bad thing. I am saying that is what all of us make our primary goal no matter what we say to our friends, to the priest or when we pray. Confess it and you will go far.

In the end this means property is the gold standard for owning the earth while we are here. Embrace it. You don't have to agree it's a good or a bad thing. It is simply the Gold. Embrace it and dance with it and you will go even further.

Many make a stand for justice when there's no danger, speak proudly of their activism when merely doing their duty or claim to hold the top people to account when it makes them a winner.

The very same people suddenly lose all this confidence when it gets dangerous, when a little more freedom is needed or when they are likely to be the loser.

The transition is always immediate. And can flip flop back and forth forever. It all depends on how the narrative you follow flows. Logic, reason, sanity, justice are merely frivolous and often treated as vexatious. 

What matters is that you are obedient. To the narrative. Because obedience makes you an instrument of control, for power. And being seen to be obedient means those higher up the chain will be pleased with you.

It's not that there are the poor, a bunch of people in the middle and the rich. It's just that everyone is competing to be the most obedient. The best rising more quickly to the top.

So laugh, secretly mind, when people say tax the rich or feed the poor. Laugh at them secretly though, else you will be signalling disobedience. When people talk about rich and poor they are lying to themselves. Harming themselves. Not embracing the gold. Not confessing the shadow. They should stop pretending to worry about the rich and poor because it is them who is being harmed. By themselves.

Obedience, leads to Power far more quickly than your principles. If you're seen as a principled person, it's treated as a flaw in your personality and you're treated as an outsider, often exiled. You have been disobedient. But if you're an expert principles troll pretending to care more about your principles than being obedient, you can run cover for those near the top, because that fake activity is signalling even more obedience. And they will be even more pleased with you.

It's no use being critical of politicians. For they are a proxy for these exact same people. They were elected exactly for being the best of all at it. Obedient people only complain about leaders spouting the competing narrative. And your leaders, again, will be pleased with you.

There is no rich and poor. There is only the more obedient, and the less.

The left side of this false battle will major on equal rights to property. The right, to Power. But in the end both are going after both. And just masquerade as planet savers. It's a competition between two almost identical ideologies, for Power. Power is all. Each side differs at the margin, only by the narrative used. A story. Just a story.

Ultimately Power is the only real goal for all of us. Property inevitably is the reward.


Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...