Skip to main content

Orwell Test Analytics - Why Women & Non Heterosexual People are Suffering


Looking at X analytics it shows that a recent theme I've been using gets far more impressions from men than women. About 90/10%

The recent theme is called The Orwell Test. The test asks people to imagine a situation where

The "Orwell Test" in Action

Try this: Take any policy that smells authoritarian and ask its defenders:

"If the other side did this exact thing, would you call it Orwellian?"

  • 90% will say yes.
  • 90% will then defend their side doing it.

That's not hypocrisy-it's tribal epistemology. The same brain that aces the 1984 quiz fails the 1984 stress test

The upshot of the test is a proof of personal development challenge. Simply put, am "I cognitively dissonant, yet am not aware of it? "

It's rather a self fulfilling challenge though because the answer is already known beforehand. *Everyone* is cognitively dissonant when it comes to tribal loyalty. 

We're all obedient to the tribal narrative for good reason - being seen to be the most obedient people will be rewarded most highly by the tribe. 

Its why the Vax was taken by nearly everyone without question. Or masks worn, lockdown obeyed, Palestine and Ukraine supported, Trump hated, climate deniers attacked with impunity, rent seeking blessed as a secret virtue and so on and so on. 

Wait... you can see me failing the Orwell Test right here in the last sentence. Do you see?

The Orwell Test is about 'obedience' being the primary driver for individuals acting in a society run as a hierarchy. 

With peoples principles (palestine, ukraine, covid etc etc) being a psychic escape, or get out of jail free card - 'moral licensing'. That is to say, "I can allow my government to kill people now because I support climate change". 

Our principles which we make spectacular public displays of, are what we use to defend this collective wide dissonance. And our principles come a distant second place to signalling our obedience as instruments of authority. 

We game society in the way because it works! I get promoted at work for it. I get more validation from having more friends. 

As a leader I will be elected if I am among the best at signalling my obedience to the authority of the tribe. It matters little that I'm robbing the hell out of my electorate or supporting a foreign regime invading their nation in my activity. 

There are no exceptions to this social behaviour, everyone is at it more than they are at anything else. I am too, yet I do recognise I am at it and work everyday to correct it, and fail every day. 

Onto the analytics: X is showing a 90/10 distribution between men and women for my replies. I think I can explain this. 

My activity on X especially on this topic is about obedience. And women are more likely to be obedient(seek the protection of a master figure) and use moral licensing(feelings and emotions) to escape that pathology and help them vote on what happens in the material world.

By saying women should not be leaders I don't mean they are any less than men at all. Often men position themselves poorly too. I do mean women are better than men at a lot of things and they are not undertaking those roles any more so no longer receive the highly valued rewards due to them. Or maybe men are blocking that opportunity by nursing babies for example. Maybe a bit of both.

Once the world only sees wealth and power as their ruler, and God is dead, you can understand why women are so tempted in this way - the non earth bound master they used to use to guide them we have killed. Gay and trans people might be a neurotic hybrid of this and we should look at this too, without judgement or law getting in the way of justice for them.

I realise these observations will upset many people. I'm not saying I support any of it. I am merely pointing at it in the hope it gets proper scrutiny, which clearly over the past 30 years has been lacking. 
Labels:

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...
Read more

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...
Read more

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...
Read more