Grok helped tell us here. Remember, it is Grok which the slave nations of the world are desperately trying to censor lately. Tell tale.
QUESTION: During the Covid pandemic many were accused of conspiracy theories about the cause and effect of the pandemic, the efficacy of the government interventions and the efficacy of the vaccine. These people were severely punished and often imprisoned simply for talking about it. How many of the theories turned out to be true. List them in a table.
I'm going to show you that this crime against humanity was not carried out by wealth and power. But, The People.
Theory | Description | Status/Evidence |
|---|---|---|
Lab leak origin | The virus escaped from a lab in Wuhan, China, possibly due to gain-of-function research. | Initially censored and labeled conspiracy; now considered most likely by the 2024 House report, citing unique virus traits not found in nature, single introduction point, WIV researchers ill in fall 2019, and no natural spillover evidence. However, Democrats note both lab and zoonotic origins remain plausible, and many scientists favor animal spillover with no lab manipulation evidence. |
US-funded gain-of-function research at Wuhan | NIH/EcoHealth Alliance used US taxpayer money for risky virus experiments in China at inadequate biosafety levels. | Confirmed in the House report, leading to funding suspensions and investigations; early denials by officials like Fauci were contradicted. Democrats argue claims not fully substantiated. |
Arbitrary social distancing rules | The 6-foot rule was not based on science. | Fauci testified it "sort of just appeared" without evidence; report calls it arbitrary. |
Ineffective mask mandates | Masks don't significantly reduce spread; mandates lacked evidence. | Report states mandates flipped messaging, caused distrust, and had inconclusive efficacy; later reviews showed limited impact. |
Harmful lockdowns | Lockdowns caused more economic, mental, and physical harm than benefits, not protecting high-risk groups effectively. | Report concludes they did more harm than good, harming youth and economy; should have been targeted. |
Harmful school closures | Prolonged closures damaged children's education, mental health, and development. | Report highlights enduring negative impacts; unnecessary beyond initial phases. Unions like AFT push back, calling this revisionist history. |
Vaccines do not prevent transmission | Vaccines reduce severity but don't stop infection or spread, contrary to early claims. | Officials promised they would halt transmission; report notes they did not, eroding trust. |
Ignored natural immunity in policies | Natural infection provides robust immunity, but mandates and guidance dismissed it. | Report says policies ignored it, harming freedoms; evidence shows it was comparable or better in some cases. |
Government censorship on social media | Biden Admin pressured platforms to suppress dissenting views, including accurate info labeled misinformation. | Report details coercion, violating free speech; included off-label drugs and lab leak discussions. Democrats criticize the report for vilifying officials. |
Harmful nursing home policies | Forcing COVID-positive patients into nursing homes (e.g., NY under Cuomo) caused deaths and was covered up. | Report calls it malpractice with evidence of cover-up; led to DOJ referral. |
Vitamin D supplementation benefits | Vitamin D (often linked to sunlight exposure) could help prevent severe COVID-19 outcomes, but was downplayed. | Multiple 2024-2025 studies and meta-analyses show supplementation reduces mortality, ICU admissions, mechanical ventilation needs, and hospital stays, especially in deficient patients. |
Ivermectin as effective treatment | Ivermectin was suppressed but could treat COVID-19 effectively. | Controversial; some reviews suggest reduced mechanical ventilation and adverse events, but major 2024 studies and meta-analyses conclude no meaningful benefits, ineffective in preventing severe outcomes or reducing symptoms in high-quality trials. Early positive studies were often flawed. |
Hydroxychloroquine efficacy | Hydroxychloroquine was banned or discouraged but could prevent or treat COVID-19. | Mixed evidence; some meta-analyses indicate reduced infection risk but with more adverse events, while others show no benefit for treatment, potential harm in hospitalized patients, and overall not recommended by consensus. |
Overuse of ventilators | Ventilators were overused early in the pandemic, leading to higher mortality. | Supported by experts and studies; initial protocols led to overuse, which was harmful for some patients, with high death rates on vents; later shifted to less invasive methods. Fact-checks note vents saved lives but overuse claims have basis in early practices. |
Overuse of end-of-life drugs | Hospitals overused sedatives like midazolam or drugs like remdesivir in protocols that allegedly hastened deaths. | Allegations persist, particularly in UK with midazolam in elderly care and US with remdesivir/sedative combos tied to incentives; linked to increased opioid-related issues during pandemic, but evidence is largely anecdotal or from social media/investigative reports, not conclusive scientific consensus. Remdesivir remains approved despite criticisms of efficacy and safety. |
Global government censorship | Governments worldwide used the pandemic to suppress information and criticism, including true reports on shortages and mishandling. | At least 83 governments violated free speech; examples include China sentencing journalists and investigating thousands for "false info," Egypt detaining medical staff for reporting PPE shortages, India arresting hundreds for alleged false info, Russia prosecuting journalists, Turkey detaining reporters and withholding stats. Many censored views later aligned with evidence, like early warnings in China. |
Social media companies' censorship | Platforms like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube suppressed content on lab leak, treatments, and vaccine skepticism, often labeling it misinformation. | Over 800 documented cases of censorship; included true speech later vindicated, such as lab leak bans lifted in 2021; Zuckerberg admitted White House pressure but platforms also acted independently. Supreme Court ruled in favor of government influence in 2024. |
Mainstream media suppression | Media outlets dismissed theories like lab leak as conspiracies, suppressed stories on government mishandling or alternative views. | Many called lab leak "debunked" or racist; later acknowledged as plausible. In China, state media censored outbreak reports. Globally, media echoed official narratives, suppressing heterodox views that gained credence. |
VAERS report censorship | VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data on COVID vaccine adverse events, including deaths, was censored or downplayed on social media and by officials. | Platforms labeled VAERS-based claims as misinformation since reports are unverified; Sen. Ron Johnson accused CDC of censoring its own data. Over 800 cases of Big Tech censorship included vaccine safety discussions; proponents argue VAERS underreports harms, but officials framed it to avoid vaccine hesitancy. |
Censorship of excess deaths discussions | Data and discussions linking excess deaths to COVID vaccines were suppressed as misinformation. | Allegations of censorship in broader infodemic context; papers on excess mortality faced retraction calls if implying vaccine links without strong evidence. General pandemic censorship included vaccine harm debates; evidence mixed, with studies showing no increased all-cause mortality from vaccines, but discussions often flagged. |
Great Barrington Declaration ignored and censored | The Declaration advocated focused protection of vulnerable groups instead of broad lockdowns, allowing herd immunity in low-risk populations, but was ignored and censored. | Signed by thousands of experts; called for targeted measures later echoed in reports criticizing blanket lockdowns. Censored via Google downranking, Facebook deleting pages, and government targeting as it contradicted official policy. Aspects like protecting elderly while minimizing societal harm were useful but dismissed as fringe. |
Fraud in COVID relief programs | Loans and handouts to individuals and businesses during the pandemic resulted in massive fraud. | Confirmed; while a precise global total is elusive, estimates for major economies suggest hundreds of billions, likely exceeding $500 billion worldwide based on reported figures from key countries. US totals estimated at $200-500 billion across programs like PPP, EIDL, and unemployment benefits (with ongoing investigations into $10 billion in attempted fraud and recoveries of hundreds of millions). UK totals £10.9 billion ($14.5 billion) in fraud and error from schemes like Bounce Back Loans and furlough, with much deemed beyond recovery. |
Use of concentration/quarantine camps for rule breakers | Nations used camp-like facilities to detain individuals breaking COVID-19 rules or spreading related misinformation, often criticized as concentration camps. | Confirmed in several countries; China built massive quarantine centers (fangcang hospitals and isolation facilities) for lockdown violators and detained people for spreading "rumors" or misinformation, with human rights reports highlighting arbitrary detentions and censorship. Australia operated quarantine camps like Howard Springs for quarantine breakers and international arrivals. Other examples include strict facilities in New Zealand and criticisms in places like India and Russia for detentions related to misinformation, though often in prisons rather than camps. Critics and human rights groups labeled some as akin to concentration camps due to conditions and lack of due process. |