Now I'm not saying legal law abiding citizens are any better as humans than refugees or immigrants.
I am saying this is what these rogue states are doing.
In the UK we can see something similar happening where people from foreign nations are flooding in, often who clearly do not like this nation or the people in it nor its culture, but not always.
The tendency seems to be to come to a well developed nation for a better life, the work and the benefits to a large extent.
Yes, clearly there is a significantly large undesirable element who want to be here for nefarious reasons and god only knows which other nation or gang is behind that. There is a good case to be made that it might be the democratically elected leadership of the nation, who have yet to ask the people if that is what they actually want.
So did the people of this country or America ever vote for this?
I'm not saying what's happening is a good or a bad thing, that something needs to be done about it or that we should push it even harder to the hilt. I am saying did the people of this nation vote for it and have they ever voted for it since at least the second world war?
I think we all know the answer which is no. The state of things has never once been voted for in any western democracy in a system wide election where the nation has been seen to decide on it.
So what this amounts to in the UK and in America really is a form of insurrection and those supporting it or letting it happen as elected members, being treasonous. Not to mention the armies of citizens who tacitly support it. But this allegation is not much good to anyone because we have now seen there are two sides, both with a lot of power, who do not seem to want to budge.
Again, I'm not saying people who are not legal citizens of this country and who are not criminals are better than or worse than the locals. I am pointing out that there is an insurrection taking place and that there are certain politicians with their own 'army' who are leading a de facto civil war against the electorate who have never voted for it yet.
To some extent this was the outcome of Brexit, its prorogation and the supreme court lawfully yet unjustly declaring it illegal. It's understandable then that there's a huge proportion of the UK electorate who are angry. And another equally large part of it who are not. THIS is a de facto civil war, by implication.
Why would these rogue states and nations be doing this I wonder? Is it for money? Is it because they truly believe that there is no such thing as a border and that all land has been stolen so anybody has a right to be on that land wherever it is? Now we see people loudly declaring "Rights!". So be it, let us talk about these hallowed rights which only mankind created. God was never present at that election!
So, who decides who gets the right to be on the best land that's available? Obviously some locations are hugely valuable, others are so undesirable no one will go near them. And a billion various iterations in between, to be shared among 8 billion people.
How then is this land - which we're confidently told by those declaring "rights", fairly distributed? Have those shouting about rights thought in the least bit about how it will be fairly distributed? Clearly this decision cannot be left for the state to attend to given its record across all of history. We know it's never going to be fairly distributed no matter what happens if the state decides it. At least we can guarantee that and know well all about it!
So who then? Quis custodiet ipsos custodes if not the state?
Can you see the problem here? A very big problem. Far bigger than deciding if the President is a dictator compared to the Mullah in Iran.
People claiming rights, yet also say the land cannot be owned, therefore everyone has a right to be on it, no matter about national borders, have a point. Everyone absolutely 101% does have a right to a piece of land, else by implication those who have no right are effectively slaves at the mercy of those who do have a right, even if they have been given their freedom on a piece of paper. This includes white people incidentally and I'm in no way talking about reparations.
The problem is no one, especially those screaming "RIGHTS!" has decided yet how on earth the right land is going to be fairly distributed among all people. Most of the world think its simply whoever buys it has a right to it. But when I buy a land title all I have is a piece of paper with ink on it which our dear leader has signed, promising to protect a bundle of rights attached to that piece of land. Nature knows nothing about ownership. Ownership is just an image create by society.
I do own several of these titles by the way. It is not hypocrisy - I have never said owning land outright instead of being a bailee is a good or a bad thing morally or ethically, only that it is unsustainable. It is not even tribal epistemology. I stand firmly in this position because given this is the law, despite its injustice, if I am to secure my household knowing this law is inherently unjust and unsustainable, I have no choice but to carry it out to the maximum extent possible to me. Or risk bankruptcy or worse for my family. This is the very nature of law created which is inherently unjust. It always means a conflict is about to happen, forever. Between those who have it today(me) and those who do not have it yet and want it. Justice has yet to come into it for 99.9999% of all people.
That is all. It has to be the most preposterous idea that land can be purchased, with money, in perpetuity. The systemic madness is this is what about 8 billion people truly believe is fair and want.
Nobody has brought this collective psychopathy under a proper test of scrutiny yet. Not only the can people not make an informed opinion and vote on it. Nor even can the state, let alone the President. No matter which side you are on nor which side you agree with, this question has yet to be put to the test of justice. Nobody has looked into this seriously enough to make way in any way at all. Nobody.
So where are we then?
We're at a point where nobody is confident about their political position at all, in spite of acting confidently. This always ends up in a war. Be that a cold war, a civil war, or a full-scale world war. It always ends up in war because that is how nature decides for us, when humanity and its blessed civilisation has failed to take care of justice.