Skip to main content

The Location Value Covenant

Gleaned from Grok

Location Value Covenants (LVCs) are a policy proposal for capturing the economic rent from land (the unearned value arising from location, community infrastructure, public services, and natural advantages) for public revenue purposes, but in a voluntary, market-friendly way rather than through compulsory taxation.The idea was developed around 2007 (and earlier discussions) by the late Dr. Adrian Wrigley and Robin Smith, associated with the Systemic Fiscal Reform Group (SFR Group), a Cambridge-based UK think tank. Robin Smith, from North Stoke, Oxfordshire, has continued promoting it through blogs, comments on economic forums, and policy discussions.Core ConceptAn LVC is a voluntary covenant (a binding legal agreement attached to the land title, similar to a restrictive covenant or mortgage condition) where a landowner opts in to pay an annual fee based on the location value of their land. This fee—essentially a share of the site's economic rent—is paid to the government (or local authority) in exchange for relief or exemption from other taxes (e.g., income tax, business rates, council tax, or portions of VAT/National Insurance in more ambitious versions).Key features:
  • Voluntary and elective: Landowners choose to enter the covenant when buying, selling, or refinancing property. It's not imposed on everyone.
  • Indexed to land value: Payments are typically a percentage of the assessed unimproved location value (excluding buildings/improvements), often adjusted periodically to reflect changes in local land prices.
  • Similar administration to mortgages: It operates like a mortgage or loan charge—stable, predictable payments (often lower initially than traditional taxes or mortgage interest), with incentives for productive use. The landowner retains full ownership and control of the property.
  • Public revenue from rent: The collected funds replace or supplement regressive taxes, directing "economic rent" (value created by society/location rather than individual effort) toward public goods instead of private pockets (e.g., banks via mortgage interest or speculators).
How It Differs from Traditional Land Value Tax (LVT)LVT is compulsory and applied universally to land values, which faces political resistance (valuation disputes, windfall losses for current owners, enforcement challenges). LVCs aim to bypass these by being:
  • Opt-in → No coercion, no sudden windfalls/losses for non-participants.
  • Transitional and compatible → Can coexist with existing systems; owners "swap" tax liabilities for LVC payments.
  • Politically mundane → Feels like a private financial arrangement (akin to a mortgage), avoiding the "tax hike" label.
  • Incentive-aligned → Encourages development/use because payments are based on location value, not improvements.
Proponents argue LVCs achieve similar Georgist goals (taxing unearned land rent while leaving labor/capital untaxed) but with fewer roadblocks, no financial system collapse risk, and easier implementation.Advantages Claimed by Proponents
  • Makes housing/business premises more affordable by reducing tax burdens on work/investment and shifting to land rent.
  • Cuts out "middlemen" like banks that capture rent via debt interest.
  • Stable for owners (indexed payments avoid volatility).
  • Funds public services/infrastructure without broad tax increases.
  • Works as a "slot-in" replacement in the current economy.
Criticisms and ContextIt's niche—discussed in Georgist circles, land reform blogs, and some heterodox economics forums (e.g., Reddit's r/georgism, tax justice sites). It hasn't been widely adopted or legislated anywhere yet. Some view it as a clever workaround to LVT's political infeasibility, while others see compulsory mechanisms as more direct/effective.For more details, see sources like the SFR Group's pages (e.g., sfrgroup.org on LVCs vs. taxes/mortgages) or Robin Smith's archived/promotional links (e.g., locationvaluecovenants.blogspot.com). The proposal ties into broader ideas of systemic fiscal reform, monetary reform, and making land rent serve the public rather than private speculation.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to Indicate Countries of the UK Are Open to Accede to the US

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious conversation to addres...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado - The 2026 Great Recession

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle always culminating in a financial crisis and great recession. The 18.6 year astronomical period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this and had been measuring it for aeons. And the politicians of the time used it to name the day when the economy had to be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because they noticed around 19 years is as long as an economy can survive when being unjustly abused by its people. Any longer making it too late to recover on its own. And without the reset much worse effects emerge. They knew this. They did not know why. They j...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...