Skip to main content

Power and the Far Right

What Does Far Right Mean. Whence the Source of the Term?

The term 'far right' was coined by Power, as a valid way to destroy the reputation of, or criminalise anyone harmed by, the unjust policy of Power.

Creation of the label far right, means Power, is terrified of, potentially serious social problems, Power itself has created, for which the far right might justifiably resist.

Power created the term far right, after, it had acted unjustly, against those it now labels far right.

Power is absolutely right to be worried by the far right. Because the far right have been unjustly harmed by Power and are now likely to try to stop Power.

The policy Power itself created will almost certainly wreak havoc at some point and honest citizens might justifiably rebel against Power. A very serious problem.

Power knows this. So Power is correct that people should be worried about the far right. Because the far right might respond by trying to stop Power.

Honest citizens might try to stop Power because they have been systemically and unjustly harmed by Power. So Power is justified with it's warnings about the far right.

This portion of the electorate are being labelled far right by Power to damage their reputation. As a way to discourage a justified resistance to Power. 

Likewise, Power is rational to criminalise the far right. Because the far right are likely to resist Power thanks to the unjust policy of Power.

There's possibly a democratic majority of society who are being called 'far right'. Power is justified in damaging their reputation and criminalising them because the far right are very likely to oppose Power for Powers' unjust policy. 

So the term 'far right' was coined by Power, as a valid way to destroy the reputation of, or criminalise anyone harmed by, the unjust policy of Power.

NOTE: substitute 'far right' for 'far left' where it suits.

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...