Skip to main content

Power and the Far Right

What Does Far Right Mean. Whence the Source of the Term?

The term 'far right' was coined by Power, as a valid way to destroy the reputation of, or criminalise anyone harmed by, the unjust policy of Power.

Creation of the label far right, means Power, is terrified of, potentially serious social problems, Power itself has created, for which the far right might justifiably resist.

Power created the term far right, after, it had acted unjustly, against those it now labels far right.

Power is absolutely right to be worried by the far right. Because the far right have been unjustly harmed by Power and are now likely to try to stop Power.

The policy Power itself created will almost certainly wreak havoc at some point and honest citizens might justifiably rebel against Power. A very serious problem.

Power knows this. So Power is correct that people should be worried about the far right. Because the far right might respond by trying to stop Power.

Honest citizens might try to stop Power because they have been systemically and unjustly harmed by Power. So Power is justified with it's warnings about the far right.

This portion of the electorate are being labelled far right by Power to damage their reputation. As a way to discourage a justified resistance to Power. 

Likewise, Power is rational to criminalise the far right. Because the far right are likely to resist Power thanks to the unjust policy of Power.

There's possibly a democratic majority of society who are being called 'far right'. Power is justified in damaging their reputation and criminalising them because the far right are very likely to oppose Power for Powers' unjust policy. 

So the term 'far right' was coined by Power, as a valid way to destroy the reputation of, or criminalise anyone harmed by, the unjust policy of Power.

NOTE: substitute 'far right' for 'far left' where it suits.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...