Skip to main content

Society is Inherently Exploitation

Exploitation is not inherently a good or a bad thing. It is observed that exploitation will happen if the people chose society to organise themselves. Which do you want, strong people and government, or weak?

The advent of society, means inevitable exploitation.

Society is The People. The People have the ultimate power.

Society always incentivises The People to exploit people. Both weak and strong. 

Weak people = weak government = the weak will be exploited

Strong people = strong government = the strong will be exploited.

Strong does not mean right wing or strength as in power. Strength means the greatest number possible have become the best people they can be. Strong people does not mutually exclude weak people. It certainly does mean weak people will rise to new heights because of the strong. And without the strong the weak will destroy society by exploiting the weak until that society is under water.

All government has the most power. They are the biggest gang with the biggest army and can devote the most resources for the exploitation. 

Weak people tend to select weak government who go on to exploit the weak the most out of all kinds of governments. 

Strong people tend to elect strong government who go on to exploit the strong, but that will be a big fight between two strong people or institutions. Nearly always there will be a stale mate with the effect of improving things based on the agreement to back off made between them. A strong person acts within the bounds which constrain him.

Beat a weak people and the inevitable weak government they deliver is like a death cult. Collectively suicidal. If society does not bring about an end to itself, nature will eventually. 

We can see strong signals for this a quarter the way through the 21st century. Where being seen as weak is taken as a virtue to be celebrated. And where the law is being adapted to protect weakness and treat it as a privilege.

Exploitation is not inherently a good or a bad thing. It is observed that exploitation will happen if the people chose society to organise themselves. Which do you want, strong people and government, or weak?

Labels:

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...
Read more

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...
Read more

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...
Read more