Skip to main content

New Nuclear in the UK and Made in the USA

The UK is already building way overpriced French EPR reactors.

Its my view these activities are part of a greater 'systemic scam'.  Much like is normal from the civil service for public capital works projects, charity and NGO's (as is being exposed now in the USA). That is, something that should cost £10Bn, ends up costing £30Bn.

In 2009 the UK government had decided on 11 new nuclear sites they might build on. Usually these were existing sites which were soon going to be expired.

This is a sad state of affairs for me, being continuously pro nuclear for the past 25 years. 

I'll be visiting the last 2 of of the 4 remaining AGR's I've not yet been to see in September. At Torness and Hartlepool. The later will close permanently in spring next year. Torness in 2030 I believe.

Back to my point: The US is driving hard their program to get jobs in the US, for better or for worse. Why don't we ask them to build up to 11 new 1800MW stations on these sites. Using their AP1000 generation III+ design. This would complement the French EPR.

And to start immediately - to walk the walk. Rather than just talk the walk. This would create competition between the French and the US for building the components. Obviously a power station in jobs terms is a massive civil works so most of the jobs will be local. But the prestige for America would be great to be leading this program and set up jobs in America for all other nations who tag onto the trend. 

The French would be compelled to compete on price in a now free'er market. The power behind the systemic scam also would have to compete freely. Thus making a far more natural price discovery re-appear for new nuclear, reducing the price enormously.

I'd say to below £10Bn per station or about £3 million / MW.

The experts will say "but we don't need that much base load". Well this is largely thanks to renewable energy which pound for pound is enormously expensive when total lifecycle costs are accounted for. Which they never are for political ideological reasons. Particularly where the grid is concerned. With the advent of home batteries and EV cars(also a dreadful subsidy farm) base load can be used all day and night to charge these batteries, when appropriate for the demand. And likewise, the stored battery energy can be sent back to the grid or the home (V2X) when the price is right. 

The technology abounds to do all this with great ease. The politics and the scams(same thing?) are all that stands in the way. 

For the local suppliers this also helps with power cuts. A battery at home means no more power cuts due to faults, not to mention the total mitigation of blackouts due to a destroyed demand curve thanks to renewables.

See here for more context: Petition: Government to indicate the UK is open to sell itself to the US

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...
Read more

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...
Read more

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...
Read more