The UN Convention on Human Obligations

Rights come with obligations. If there are no obligations present then the right doesn't exist either. Unless your intention is to deliberately wreak havoc.

This law aims to balance out all laws of all nations where they talk about human rights.

What it says is that if a person in law claims some form of human right, they must also show that they have delivered their own human obligations in a balanced response.

And that if they're unable to show these obligations, the claimed rights are null and void.

It also implies that if governments try to enforce human rights when they know the obligations aren't present then they can be prosecuted under the law. 

This also applies to judges, lawyers, activists movements and protest groups. Who tend to be an arm of the state anyway these days.

Here is a good example of where it might apply where immigrants are crossing borders and protected by human rights in spite of having delivered no balancing obligations. 

Human rights groups who say nothing about the obligations are planet savers destroying the world.